Table of Contents
UPSC interview evaluation — Delhi HC 2024
Delhi High Court · 2024-06-20 · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3876
Own total marks are accessible; interview-board internal scoring is not.
Case details
| Court | Delhi High Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2024-06-20 |
| Citation | 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3876 |
| Bench | N, a, v, i, n, , C, h, a, w, l, a, , J |
| Petitioner | Neha Verma |
| Respondent | UPSC |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(e) |
| Outcome | partly allowed |
Outcome
UPSC interview marks of the applicant are disclosable; panel-member-wise scoring is §8(1)(e) fiduciary.
Ratio decidendi
An aspirant's own total marks in the UPSC personality test are disclosable following Aditya Bandopadhyay. Panel-member-wise scoring breakdown attracts §8(1)(e) as it reveals the fiduciary internal deliberation of the Commission. Aggregate total suffices for the candidate's purpose.
Keywords
UPSC, interview, section 8(1)(e), fiduciary, Aditya Bandopadhyay
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Recruitment panel anonymity — CIC line (CIC 2014)
- School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC (HC-CAL 2022)
- UPSC v. Angesh Kumar (SC 2018)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion