Recruitment panel anonymity — CIC line
Quick Reply: Interviewer identity protected under §8[1][g]; candidate's own score, rank and general evaluation framework disclosable.
Central Information Commission · 2014-01-01 · Citation awaited
Interviewer identity protected under §8[1][g]; candidate's own score, rank and general evaluation framework disclosable.
Interviewer names are §8(1)(g) protected; candidate's own score + framework disclosable.
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2014-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Candidate / RTI applicant |
| Respondent | Recruiting body |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(g) |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
Outcome
Interviewer identity protected under §8(1)(g); candidate's own score, rank and general evaluation framework disclosable.
Ratio decidendi
Following Bihar PSC v. Rizwi (SC 2012), the CIC protects interview-panel member identities under §8(1)(g). The candidate's own interview score, the marking framework, and aggregate marks are disclosable.
Keywords
recruitment, interview panel, §8(1)(g), CIC, scores
This case cites
Similar cases in the corpus
- IIT faculty recruitment — CIC (CIC 2022)
- School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC (HC-CAL 2022)
- Search-cum-Selection committee records — CIC (CIC 2016)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.