UPSC v. Angesh Kumar — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

UPSC's scaling & raw-score methodology, cut-off mechanics and marks-moderation records are §8(1)(e) / (d) protected.

Exam-related records of UPSC CSE (cut-off, scaled score tabulation, disqualification criteria) protected under §8(1)(e)/(d).

The raw score, scaling methodology and moderation records of the UPSC Civil Services Examination are held in fiduciary capacity with a public interest in protecting exam integrity. Disclosure would compromise future examinations; §8(1)(e) and §8(1)(d) apply.

UPSC, civil services, scaling, §8(1)(e), §8(1)(d)

• CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC 2011)
• ICAI v. Shaunak H. Satya (SC 2011)

These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.

• Recruitment panel anonymity — CIC line (CIC 2014)
• CBSE v. Central Information Commission (HC-DEL 2011)
• Open-evaluation regime post-Aditya Bandopadhyay — CIC directives (CIC 2012)
• §23 civil-courts bar — SC clarification (SC 2017)
• ICAI v. Shaunak H. Satya (SC 2011)

• All Supreme Court of India rulings in the corpus
• All RTI cases turning on §8
• All landmark rulings
• Full case-law search
• Case-Law Database — overview
• PIO RTI Reply Guide
• The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated
• External reported text →

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.