Module 01 — Campaign-scale RTI design

RTI for Activists & NGOs Module 01

Quick Reply: RTI for Activists & NGOs — Module 01: Campaign-scale RTI design. Design RTI campaigns that produce statewide or national-scale evidence.

Goal: Design RTI campaigns that produce statewide or national-scale evidence.

When one RTI isn't enough

Single RTI = one data point. Multi-RTI campaigns = pattern. To prove systemic problems (not isolated incidents), you need: same questions, same period, scaled across geographies / departments / years.

Examples:

  1. 'PMAY housing allotment irregularities' — needs 50+ district RTIs
  2. 'Mid-day meal scheme leakage' — needs 100+ school + 30+ DEO RTIs
  3. 'CAG audit follow-up' — needs ministry + state-cell RTIs

The 4-axis grid

Design every campaign on 4 axes:

  1. Geographic axis: districts/states (X RTIs)
  2. Time axis: years (FY 2020-21 to 2025-26 = 6 years)
  3. Department axis: cross-cutting (revenue + welfare + audit)
  4. Question axis: identical sub-questions across all RTIs (so responses can be tabulated)

A tight 4-axis grid produces a publication-ready dataset on receipt.

Identical-question rigor

For tabulation to work, every RTI must have literally identical sub-questions:

  1. (a) Number of beneficiaries enrolled in [scheme] in FY [year], your district.
  2. (b) Number of beneficiaries who received the FIRST instalment.
  3. © Number who received the SECOND.
  4. (d) Total funds disbursed (₹ lakh).
  5. (e) Number of complaints received about non-disbursal.
  6. (f) Number of complaints resolved.

If any RTI varies the question, that data point drops out of the analysis.

Volunteer-scale logistics

For a 100+ RTI campaign:

  1. Use a central spreadsheet with columns: state, district, PIO, ref no., filing date, response status, response excerpt.
  2. Recruit state coordinators to file from local addresses (some states require local addresses).
  3. Pre-stamp + pre-address envelopes at one central location, then ship to volunteers.
  4. Consolidated First Appeal pack ready when ~30% of RTIs return refusals.

Pattern recognition

Once 60-70% of RTIs return:

  1. Compare similar districts for variance — large variance = local irregularity worth investigating.
  2. Compare year-on-year within a district — sudden change = signal.
  3. Compute disclosure rate by state/department — low disclosure rate = system opacity (a story in itself).
  4. Identify outliers: 1-2 PIOs who give exemplary responses (use as 'compliance benchmark' in your report).

✅ Quiz

Quiz available from your course dashboard.

Next

📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views