Get the RTI Wiki appFree on iPhone and Android.

Right to Information Wiki Blog

Quick Reply: RTI Wiki blog — analysis, case-law summaries, and citizen guides on Right to Information Act 2005.

Latest RTI decision notes

NEET-UG 2026 Paper Leak: Re-test and RTI Rights

NEET-UG 2026 Cancelled: Paper Leak Explained, Re-test, Rights, RTI — RTI Wiki

Updated 12 May 2026. The Centre has cancelled NEET-UG 2026 held on 3 May 2026 after the Rajasthan Special Operations Group (SOG) traced a handwritten “guess paper” with 135 questions matching the actual paper — including all 90 Biology and all 45 Chemistry questions. The National Testing Agency (NTA) received the malpractice inputs on 7 May 2026, escalated to central agencies on 8 May 2026, and confirmed the cancellation through a public notice on 12 May 2026. The matter has been referred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for a comprehensive probe. Over 22.79 lakh candidates had registered, with the attempt held across 5,400+ centres, including 14 abroad. A re-test was later held on 21 June 2026 using the existing registration, candidature and centre choices, with no fresh fee charged. This NEET paper leak explained guide now covers both the 2024 systemic controversy and the fresh 2026 cancellation: how exam leaks happen in India, what the Supreme Court has said, what legal rights students have, how RTI can reveal examination records, and what families should do without panic.

Breaking — 12 May 2026. NTA has cancelled NEET-UG 2026 held on 3 May 2026. Rajasthan SOG traced a handwritten paper with 135 questions matching the actual exam (all 90 Biology + all 45 Chemistry). Matter referred to CBI. A re-test will be held on a date to be notified; original registration + centres remain valid; no additional fee. Affected candidates: 22.79 lakh registered candidates, across 5,400+ centres including 14 abroad. Source: NTA public notice dated 12 May 2026 at nta.ac.in and neet.nta.nic.in. Action now — do not pay anyone claiming “confirmed leak” for the re-test; preserve your admit card + login + every NTA email/SMS; watch only the official NTA portal and registered email/SMS for re-test dates.

Quick Answer. A paper leak becomes legally serious when there is reliable proof that the exam process was compromised. Courts usually ask whether the irregularity was isolated or systemic, whether tainted and untainted candidates can be separated, and whether cancellation would be fair to all candidates.

→ Read more...

NEET 2026 Fee Refund: Last Date 27 May

NEET 2026 fee refund process started, last date 27 May 2026, bank details and safety checklist

The NEET 2026 fee refund process has started. Candidates have to submit preferred bank account details on the official NEET UG 2026 registration portal by 27 May 2026, up to 11:50 PM. NTA has said the refund facility is for submission of bank details for processing the examination fee refund, and candidates should log in through the official NEET portal. Business Standard/PTI, 23 May 2026, NEET official website

Quick Reply: Go to neet.nta.nic.in, open the NEET UG 2026 candidate login or refund link, sign in with your application credentials, enter account holder name, IFSC code, account number, and bank name, optionally upload a cancelled cheque, review every digit, and submit before 27 May 2026, 11:50 PM. NTA has said submitted bank details will be treated as final, so do not submit in a hurry. Indian Express, 24 May 2026

If you are searching for the NEET refund link, use only the official NEET website and the NTA website. Do not use Telegram links, coaching-centre forms, Google Forms, or payment links that claim to “speed up” the refund. NEET official website, NTA official website

→ Read more...

Pendency Is Not a Valid Reason to Deny RTI

Quick Reply: A PIO cannot deny an RTI just because a matter is “pending” — the CIC has ruled that pendency alone is not a valid ground under Section 8.

Direct Answer. The Central Information Commission has held that mere pendency of a decision, inquiry, or examination is not a valid ground to deny RTI disclosure. Unless the Public Information Officer specifically cites a Section 8 sub-clause AND shows how disclosure would prejudice the pending matter, the information must be released. Ratio: X v. Medical Council of India (CIC/YA/A/2016/001453, 9 January 2017), applied widely since.

Mere pendency is not a valid RTI denial — RTI Wiki

→ Read more...

Was this useful?
- views