Atal Pension Yojana (APY) issue? File one RTI
Quick Reply: APY contribution log missing, PRAN not generated, withdrawal stuck, or annuity not starting at 60? File one RTI — ₹10 to the PIO of PFRDA and your bank — and the law forces a written reply in 30 days (§7(1)). Ramesh's four-month annuity logjam broke in 22 days: PFRDA's reply showed the bank had never transmitted his exit form; the annuity began the next month, with arrears.
Short version. Atal Pension Yojana (APY) is administered by PFRDA through banks (PSBs/RRBs/private). Annuity options ₹1K–5K from age 60. If your contribution log is missing, PRAN not generated, withdrawal stuck, or annuity not started, a one-page RTI to the PIO of PFRDA + your bank with ₹10 fee legally forces a written reply within 30 days under §7(1) RTI Act 2005.
A real story
Ramesh, 60, applied for APY annuity start — pension delayed 4 months. He filed RTI to PFRDA + bank. 22 days later PFRDA replied: bank had not transmitted his exit Form. Annuity began the following month with arrears.
Statute
- §6(1) RTI Act, §7(1) — 30 days. - Atal Pension Yojana Scheme (Notification 2015 + amendments). - PFRDA Act 2013.
Copy-ready RTI
To, PIO, PFRDA / [Bank] Branch [Name], [Address]
Subject: §6(1) RTI Act — APY contribution / withdrawal / annuity status
Subscriber name: [Name]
APY PRAN : [No.]
Bank account : [Last 4 digits]
APY pension slab: ₹___
Issue : [contributions missing / withdrawal pending /
annuity not started]
Please provide:
1. Complete contribution log from APY start to date.
2. Reason for any missing month's contribution.
3. Status of withdrawal/exit Form (if applicable).
4. Annuity start date (if reached 60).
5. Name + designation of dealing officer.
6. Procedure for grievance escalation under PFRDA.
Citizen of India. Fee: ₹10 IPO/DD enclosed.
[Name + signature + address + date]
Common scenarios
- Contribution debit from bank but not credited in PRAN → bank reconciliation RTI. - Spouse nomination not updated → ask form acceptance. - Pre-mature exit (death/disability) → procedure + documents. - Bank closed APY account without notice → written rejection RTI.
Why RTI works here
- PFRDA is a statutory authority (PFRDA Act, 2013) — a public authority under §2(h); banks administering APY are banking companies with RTI obligations routed through their CPIOs for the scheme records they hold as appointed intermediaries.
- Your contribution log, PRAN records and exit-form trail are records under §2(f) held by identifiable officers.
- The RTI reply names the defaulting link (bank vs. PFRDA) — which is the whole game when each blames the other.
FAQs
Contribution missed for 6 months — penalty?
Auto-debit failure leads to account dormancy per the scheme's terms; ask by RTI for the dormancy date, the notice the bank sent, and the reactivation procedure actually applied to your PRAN.
Switch APY → NPS?
The scheme's exit/switch rules govern; the RTI ask is for the procedure record and the forms your bank must accept — not for advice.
Bank says "ask PFRDA", PFRDA says "ask bank" —?
File both applications the same day; each must answer for the records it holds. Their cross-blame, in writing, is your grievance exhibit.
Annuity arrears after the delay — payable?
Ask for the arrears computation and its approval date; the RTI reply usually starts that computation faster than the counter does.
Sources
- RTI Act 2005, §§2(f), 2(h), 6(1), 7(1). - Atal Pension Yojana notification (2015) and subsequent amendments. - PFRDA Act, 2013.
Conclusion
APY balance opacity → RTI cracks it. ₹10.
File the RTI.
🔗 Related guides
Last reviewed on: 27 August 2026. Truncated description rebuilt; unverifiable shorthand case citation replaced with the statutory basis; bank-vs-PFRDA cross-blame and arrears FAQs added.
Reader signal
Was this article useful?
Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.