Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026)

Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026)

Quick Reply: Exam revaluation / rechecking is delayed or denied. RTI to evaluator for marks-record, evaluator notes. Aditya Bandopadhyay route + template (2026).

After CBSE v.

Why this RTI works

After CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011), evaluated answer-sheets are 'information' under §2(f). The candidate can demand the answer-sheet, mark-book extract and evaluator notes via RTI. Most boards moved to a formal reval/recheck/photocopy regime, but RTI remains the safety net for unjustified denials.

  • RTI Act, 2005 §6, §7(1), §2(f).
  • CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011) — evaluated answer-sheet is 'information'; disclosure to candidate is mandatory.
  • ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011) — fiduciary defence does not apply to candidate's own record.
  • Conducting body's own bye-laws on revaluation.

RTI template — copy & file

To:
The Public Information Officer (PIO),
[Office name + address].

Subject: RTI under §6 — Exam Revaluation query

Sir/Madam,

Under the RTI Act, 2005 read with CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011), kindly provide:

1. Photocopy of evaluated answer-sheet, [EXAM], Roll No. [NUMBER], [SUBJECT].
2. Mark-book / award-list extract showing my marks question-wise.
3. Status of revaluation request dated [DATE], application no. [NUMBER].
4. Comparison of total marks before and after revaluation.
5. Written reasons if revaluation has not changed marks.

Rs. 10 IPO enclosed.

Yours faithfully,
[Name]
[Address + phone + email]
[Date]

Escalation timeline

  • Day 31 — First Appeal to FAA.
  • Day 76 — Second Appeal to CIC / SIC.
  • Parallel — Conducting body's revaluation grievance cell.

Case law anchors

  • CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011) — Foundational — answer-sheets disclosable to candidate.
  • ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011) — Examining body's fiduciary defence narrowed to third parties.
  • Kendriya Vidyalaya v. CIC (Delhi HC, 2013) — Internal evaluation records disclosable.

Common mistakes

  • Asking for the evaluator's identity — protected under §8(1)(g).
  • Asking before the bye-law revaluation window opens.
  • Forgetting to enclose original revaluation receipt.

Frequently asked questions

Can I ask for evaluator's name?

No — §8(1)(g) protects evaluator identity. You can ask for the marks-record + answer-sheet copy.

Cost of answer-sheet copy?

Boards charge Rs. 700-1500 for photocopy under their own bye-laws. RTI fee is separate Rs. 10.

Sources

  • RTI Act, 2005 — full text.
  • Citation chain in body.
  • Citizen Charter of the relevant authority.
  • Case-law database at /cases/search.

Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.

📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views