Table of Contents
§6(2) no-motive rule — Madras HC
High Court of Madras · 2013-01-01 · Citation awaited
§6(2) bars inquiry into motive; PIO cannot reject citing applicant's alleged vexatious or malafide intent.
Case details
| Court | High Court of Madras |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2013-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | RTI applicant |
| Respondent | PIO |
| RTI Act sections | §6(2) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
Outcome
A PIO cannot reject an RTI application on the ground that the applicant has a 'personal motive' or 'harassment intent'.
Ratio decidendi
§6(2) expressly bars a PIO from requiring the applicant to state any reason for seeking information. A PIO cannot reject on the ground of perceived 'malafide', 'harassment intent', or 'vexatious' purpose. §8 is the exclusive ground for refusal.
Keywords
§6(2), motive, Madras HC, vexatious applications
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Irrelevant Information — CIC directive line (CIC 2010)
- Repeat and frivolous RTI threshold — CIC (CIC 2019)
- Multiple-topic RTI applications — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2021)
- Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO (HC-DEL 2010)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion