§6(2) no-motive rule — Madras HC

§6(2) no-motive rule — Madras HC — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: A PIO cannot reject an RTI application on the ground that the applicant has a 'personal motive' or 'harassment intent'. §6(2) bars inquiry into motive; PIO cannot.

High Court of Madras · 2013-01-01 · Citation awaited

§6(2) bars inquiry into motive; PIO cannot reject citing applicant's alleged vexatious or malafide intent.

Case details

Court High Court of Madras
Decided 2013-01-01
Citation Citation awaited
Petitioner RTI applicant
Respondent PIO
RTI Act sections §6(2)
Outcome Applicant allowed

Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳

Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.

Donate Now

Outcome

A PIO cannot reject an RTI application on the ground that the applicant has a 'personal motive' or 'harassment intent'.

Ratio decidendi

§6(2) expressly bars a PIO from requiring the applicant to state any reason for seeking information. A PIO cannot reject on the ground of perceived 'malafide', 'harassment intent', or 'vexatious' purpose. §8 is the exclusive ground for refusal.

Keywords

§6(2), motive, Madras HC, vexatious applications

Similar cases in the corpus

These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.

Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.

📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views