Amit Kumar Srivastava v. CVC — CIC 2022
Quick Reply: Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed. Case: Amit Kumar Srivastava v. Central Vigilance Commission — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.
Central Information Commission · 2022-09-14 · CIC File No. IK/132956925
Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
Information sought is personal
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2022-09-14 |
| Citation | CIC File No. IK/132956925 |
| Bench | CIC Single Bench |
| Petitioner | Amit Kumar Srivastava |
| Respondent | Central Vigilance Commission |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1) |
| Outcome | Rejected |
Outcome
Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed
Ratio decidendi
Information sought is personal
Keywords
central, vigilance, commission
Similar cases in the corpus
- CVC / vigilance circulars — CIC (CIC 2020)
- Vigilance investigation records — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2015)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary ·