Amit Kumar Srivastava v. Central Vigilance Commission — CIC 2022
Quick Reply: Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed. Case: Amit Kumar Srivastava v. Central Vigilance Commission — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.
Central Information Commission · 2022-09-14 · CIC File No. IK/132956925
Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
Information sought is personal
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2022-09-14 |
| Citation | CIC File No. IK/132956925 |
| Bench | C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h |
| Petitioner | Amit Kumar Srivastava |
| Respondent | Central Vigilance Commission |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1) |
| Outcome | Rejected |
Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳
Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.
Outcome
Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed
Ratio decidendi
Information sought is personal
Keywords
central, vigilance, commission
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- CVC / vigilance circulars — CIC (CIC 2020)
- Vigilance investigation records — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2015)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Reader signal
Was this article useful?
Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.