CVC / vigilance circulars — CIC

CVC / vigilance circulars — CIC — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: CVC circulars, vigilance guidelines, and disciplinary policy documents are public records disclosable under §4. CVC / vigilance POLICY circulars are §4 public. </WRAP>

Central Information Commission · 2020-01-01 · Citation awaited

CVC / vigilance POLICY circulars are §4 public records; individual case files remain §8(1)(h) protected during pendency. ===== Case details ===== ^ Court | Central Information Commission | ^ Decided | 2020-01-01 | ^ Citation | Citation awaited | ^ Petitioner | RTI applicant | ^ Respondent | CVC / vigilance unit | ^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(h) | ^ Outcome | Applicant allowed | ===== Outcome ===== CVC circulars, vigilance guidelines, and disciplinary policy documents are public records disclosable under §4. ===== Ratio decidendi ===== CVC circulars, vigilance manual updates, and disciplinary-policy guidelines govern the public authority's own functioning and are disclosable under §4(1)(b)(v) (rules, regulations, instructions). Individual vigilance case files remain protected under §8(1)(h) during pendency and §8(1)(j) thereafter. ===== Keywords ===== CVC, vigilance circulars, §4(1)(b)(v), CIC ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law. * Vigilance investigation records — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2015) * PDS leakage investigation — Rajasthan SIC (SIC-RJ 2021) * LIC policy-holder records — CIC (CIC 2021) * Service book disclosure to public servant — Kerala HC (HC-KER 2021) * CBIC customs-duty classification — CIC (CIC 2020) ===== Related ===== * All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus * All RTI cases turning on §4 * All RTI cases turning on §7 * All RTI cases turning on §8 * Full case-law search * Case-Law Database — overview * PIO RTI Reply Guide * The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated

Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.

Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳

Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.

Donate Now
📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views
Article created: 1 July 2026, 21:56 ISTLast updated: 22 July 2026, 23:14 ISTWritten by Editors of righttoinformation.wiki