Table of Contents
BMC slum-redevelopment records — Bombay HC
High Court of Bombay · 2021-01-01 · Citation awaited
SRA slum-redevelopment records: eligibility lists + allotment orders = §4(1)(b) proactive disclosure.
Case details
| Court | High Court of Bombay |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2021-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Slum-dweller / RTI applicant |
| Respondent | SRA / BMC |
| RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
Outcome
SRA slum-redevelopment project records, eligibility lists, and allotment orders are §4(1)(b) proactive-disclosure material.
Ratio decidendi
The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) in Maharashtra administers slum-redevelopment schemes funded by public money. Eligibility registers, scheme approvals, allotment records, and developer-DCR compliance are §4(1)(b) material — proactive disclosure on the SRA portal is mandatory.
Keywords
SRA, slum, Bombay HC, §4(1)(b)
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- DDA housing records — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2019)
- PDS scheme records — Jharkhand HC (HC-JH 2021)
- HSVP housing records — Haryana SIC (SIC-HR 2022)
- Mining district-fund records — Jharkhand SIC (SIC-JH 2022)
- NGT order compliance records — Rajasthan HC (HC-RAJ 2021)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion