Table of Contents
DDA housing records — Delhi HC
High Court of Delhi · 2019-01-01 · Citation awaited
DDA = §2(h); draw results + allotment files + possession status = §4(1)(b)(xii) proactive disclosure.
Case details
| Court | High Court of Delhi |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2019-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Allottee / RTI applicant |
| Respondent | DDA |
| RTI Act sections | §2(h), §4(1)(b)(xii) |
| Outcome | Applicant allowed |
Outcome
DDA is a public authority; draw results, allotment files and possession-status records are §4 disclosure material.
Ratio decidendi
Delhi Development Authority is a public authority under §2(h). Housing-scheme draw results, category-wise allotment lists, possession-status records and utilisation statements are §4(1)(b)(xii) subsidy-programme material (subsidised housing counts as a welfare subsidy for proactive-disclosure purposes).
Keywords
DDA, Delhi HC, §4(1)(b)(xii), housing
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- HSVP housing records — Haryana SIC (SIC-HR 2022)
- PMAY-G rural-housing records — MP HC (HC-MP 2022)
- SACI / agri-subsidy records — Punjab HC (HC-PB 2021)
- PDS scheme records — Jharkhand HC (HC-JH 2021)
- Mid-day Meal scheme records — CIC (CIC 2018)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion