Get the RTI Wiki appFree on iPhone and Android.

Right to Information Wiki Blog

Quick Reply: RTI Wiki blog — analysis, case-law summaries, and citizen guides on Right to Information Act 2005.

Latest RTI decision notes

How to Write an RTI Application

Quick Reply: After 25 years of training PIOs and activists, here is the single lesson that fixes most rejections: ask for records, not answers. The rewrite takes two minutes.

Practice this in 30 seconds. Use our free RTI Assistant — AI-driven drafting, First Appeal, Second Appeal in one place.

How to Write an RTI Application — RTI Wiki

In one line. If you want to know how to write an RTI application that works, write it to request records that exist — not answers, not explanations, not “why.” This single shift fixes most rejections. The rest of this piece shows you how, from someone who has read thousands of replies.

→ Read more...

RTI: No Right to Insist on Original Documents

Gujarat High Court RTI decision 2026 - correctness disputes, original documents, and PIO duties under Section 2(f)

Quick Reply: Gujarat High Court held that once accessible RTI records and copies are supplied, an applicant cannot insist on original documents through the CPIO. Evaluatory analysis of Himanshu Parmar v State…

A practitioner evaluation of the Gujarat High Court's order dated 5 May 2026 in Himanshu Parsottambhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat & Ors., R/Special Civil Application No. 15120 of 2025. The first takeaway is direct: RTI gives access to records, inspection and copies. It does not give the applicant custody of original government or university documents once accessible records have been supplied. The second takeaway is procedural: the Information Commission is not a court for deciding whether the supplied information proves a recruitment or reservation-law violation.

→ Read more...

Privacy and RTI: Filing Smart in the DPDP Era (2026 Guide)

Quick Reply: File RTI after DPDP 2026: 5 proven strategies beating the wave of Section 8 1 j rejections. RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference, 2026.

Practice this in 30 seconds. Use our free RTI Assistant — AI-driven drafting, First Appeal, Second Appeal in one place.

blog / filing-smart-dpdp-era-2026 — RTI Wiki

Did you know? A well-drafted “aggregate” RTI wins almost every time, even after the 14 November 2025 amendment. The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 did not touch Section 8(2), the public-interest override. That clause is still your lifeline.

In one line. The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, notified on 14 November 2025, substituted the text of Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. A steep share of Q1 2026 RTIs have been refused on the strength of that substitution. This guide shows how to draft an application the Public Information Officer cannot refuse by reflex.

What that means in practice.

  • Names trigger rejections. Naming an officer or a citizen in the question is the fastest route to a Section 8(1)(j) refusal.
  • Aggregates and functions win. Ask about the department's spending, the scheme's cost, the tender's award criteria, not about who drew what.
  • Section 8(2) is intact. The public-interest override survives the amendment and must be read into every refusal.

File RTI after DPDP 2026: 5 proven strategies beating the wave of Section 8(1)(j) rejections. India's independent Right to Information reference, updated 2026.

Updated: 20 April 2026. Rejection rates reported above 40 per cent in the first quarter of 2026.

→ Read more...

Was this useful?
- views