Passport Verification Report to be disclosed under RTI
Quick Reply: An adverse police verification report (PVR) can stall or sink a passport — and the applicant often never sees it. The Central Information Commission has directed disclosure of the PVR to the applicant it concerns: the report is information about you, held by a public authority, and seeing it is the precondition to answering it. The order below is the anchor; the ask-format follows.
What happened
A passport office had issued a show-cause notice to the complainant after an adverse report from the Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore came in during police verification. The complainant filed an RTI application seeking a certified copy of the complete police verification report. The Commission directed disclosure of the police verification report relating to the applicant — order CIC/VS/C/2014/900344 & CIC/VS/C/2014/900297, dated 21 February 2017 (hosted: full order).
Why it matters
- The PVR is the usual invisible culprit behind passport delays, show-cause notices and refusals — you cannot rebut what you cannot read.
- The applicant's own verification report is their information (§2(f)); third-party/confidentiality objections give way when the subject of the report is the requester.
- With the report in hand, the response writes itself: correct the factual error with the verifying officer, or answer the show-cause with the record.
How to ask for your PVR
1. **Address:** the CPIO of the **Regional Passport Office** that processed your file (central authority — file at [[https://rtionline.gov.in|rtionline.gov.in]], ₹10). 2. **Queries:** "certified copies of (1) the complete police verification report for my application file no. ___; (2) the report's covering note/summary placed on my file; (3) the correspondence from the verifying police authority." 3. **Refusal patterns:** "third party" (the report is about **you**); §8(1)(g) (no investigation to protect once verification is complete — see [[:explanations:investigation-under-rti|the completion test]]); "confidential" (cite the CIC order above). 4. If stalled: first appeal; the demand for the **notice copy** under §11 usually ends the "third party" defence. 5. Grievance running parallel? [[:complaints/passport-complaint|Passport complaint routes]].
FAQs
Will asking for my PVR anger the office handling my passport?
It is a statutory right exercised about your own file; the order above is exactly this ask, allowed.
Verification is still ongoing — does 8(1)(h) block it?
Possibly, while live — see the completion test. After verification completes and the decision is made, the impediment rationale falls away.
The adverse PVR is factually wrong — what then?
Answer the show-cause with documents; simultaneously seek correction with the verifying police unit; the RTI-obtained report is your exhibit in both.
Can an agent file this for me?
The application must be by a citizen in their own name (§3) — you sign; anyone may post it.
Related
Sources
- CIC, CIC/VS/C/2014/900344 & CIC/VS/C/2014/900297 dated 21 February 2017 (Vasantha Dorai Raj) — order hosted above.
- Right to Information Act, 2005, §§2(f), 6, 8, 11.
Last reviewed on: 27 August 2026. The two unrelated filler citations (a 2020 SC Constitution Bench matter and an unrelated accountability case) removed; ask-format, refusal patterns and FAQ added around the real hosted order.
Reader signal
Was this article useful?
Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.
