vs:rti-vs-lokpal-lokayukta
Table of Contents
RTI vs Lokpal/Lokayukta — when to use which?
TL;DR. RTI gets the information. Lokpal/Lokayukta investigates the corruption. Many citizens confuse them. Use RTI to gather facts → use Lokpal/Lokayukta if those facts evidence corruption by a public servant.
Compared
| Aspect | RTI | Lokpal/Lokayukta |
| Statutory basis | RTI Act 2005 | Lokpal Act 2013 / state Lokayukta Acts |
| Goal | Information | Corruption investigation |
| Cost | Rs 10 | Free |
| Outcome | Documents, file location, decision rationale | Investigation, FIR, prosecution |
| Reply timeline | 30 days | “reasonable time” |
| Penalty teeth | Rs 250/day on PIO | Criminal prosecution against public servant |
Hybrid
Use RTI to gather facts about a suspect transaction or selection process. If facts show corruption, file a Lokayukta complaint with the RTI documents as annexures. Documentary evidence strengthens Lokayukta cases significantly.
Related
Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.
Was this helpful?
— views
Thanks for the signal.
vs/rti-vs-lokpal-lokayukta.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
