📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
rules:sc [2018/03/06 15:06] – Shrawanrules:sc [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Supreme Court of India RTI Rules ====== ====== Supreme Court of India RTI Rules ======
-{{tag>Court Rules}} + 
-{{:rules:supreme_court_of_india_-_200705.jpg?460|Supreme Court of India (Source: Wikipedia commons) Photo: Legaleagle86)}}+{{ :social:auto:rules-sc.png?direct&1200 |rules / sc — RTI Wiki}} 
 + 
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(rti,rules) 
 +metatag-description=(This Registry for the present is following the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 (22 of 2005) which is also available on the website of the Supreme Court.)}} 
 + 
 + 
 +{{tag>court rules}} 
 +{{:rules:supreme_court_of_india_-_200705.jpg?460x345|Supreme Court of India (Source: Wikipedia commons) Photo: Legaleagle86)}} 
 + 
 + 
 +**This Registry for the present is following the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 (22 of 2005) which is also available on the website of the Supreme Court.** 
 **Right to Information Act, 2005** **Right to Information Act, 2005**
  
Line 13: Line 24:
 Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.\\ Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.\\
 Tel. No.23073580/ Fax No.23384533\\ Tel. No.23073580/ Fax No.23384533\\
-e-mail:[[[email protected]]] +e-mail:[[mailto:[email protected]]] 
  
 ===== Transparency Officer for Supreme Court ===== ===== Transparency Officer for Supreme Court =====
Line 23: Line 34:
 Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.\\ Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.\\
 Tel. No.23385265/ Fax No.23384533\\ Tel. No.23385265/ Fax No.23384533\\
-e-mail:[[[email protected]]] +e-mail:[[mailto:[email protected]]] 
  
 ===== First Appellate Authority ===== ===== First Appellate Authority =====
Line 33: Line 44:
 Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.\\ Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.\\
 Tel. No.23385265/ Fax No.23384533\\ Tel. No.23385265/ Fax No.23384533\\
-e-mail:[[[email protected]]] \\+e-mail:[[mailto:[email protected]]] \\
  
 ===== Fees for obtaining Information ===== ===== Fees for obtaining Information =====
Line 41: Line 52:
 <blockquote>Note : Court fee and cheques are not acceptable as the same are not valid mode as per rules.</blockquote> <blockquote>Note : Court fee and cheques are not acceptable as the same are not valid mode as per rules.</blockquote>
 ===== Downloads ===== ===== Downloads =====
-<html> +- {{:rules:supreme_court_rules_1966.pdf|The Supreme Court Rules 1966}} 
-<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> +  - [[act:translations:hindi|RTI Act in Hindi (with PDF download)]]
-<ins class="adsbygoogle" +
-     style="display:block; text-align:center;" +
-     data-ad-layout="in-article" +
-     data-ad-format="fluid" +
-     data-ad-client="ca-pub-3082882621726443" +
-     data-ad-slot="9529004960"></ins> +
-<script> +
-     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); +
-</script> +
-</html> +
-  - {{:rules:supreme_court_rules_1966.pdf|The Supreme Court Rules 1966}} +
-  - {{:downloads:act:rules:andhrapradesh:rtiact-hindi.pdf|RTI Act in Hindi}}+
 ===== External Links ===== ===== External Links =====
  
Line 70: Line 69:
   - On 10th November 2007, Subhash Chandra Agrawal filed an RTI request with the SC asking for information concerning declaration of assets by Supreme Court Judges, among other things. The PIO denied the request, claiming he did not hold the information. Agrawal filed a first appeal asking that his application may be transferred to the Public Authority holding the information. The Registrar asked the PIO to re-consider the request, but he denied the information again. Agrawal moved the Central Information Commission (CIC) which in January 2009, asked the PIO to furnish the information [PDF].The SC challenged this order twice before the Delhi High Court (HC) even as it made some information about judges’ assets public on its website, but the HC upheld the CIC’s ruling. Read the decision [[http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/FB-06012009-01.pdf|here]]!   - On 10th November 2007, Subhash Chandra Agrawal filed an RTI request with the SC asking for information concerning declaration of assets by Supreme Court Judges, among other things. The PIO denied the request, claiming he did not hold the information. Agrawal filed a first appeal asking that his application may be transferred to the Public Authority holding the information. The Registrar asked the PIO to re-consider the request, but he denied the information again. Agrawal moved the Central Information Commission (CIC) which in January 2009, asked the PIO to furnish the information [PDF].The SC challenged this order twice before the Delhi High Court (HC) even as it made some information about judges’ assets public on its website, but the HC upheld the CIC’s ruling. Read the decision [[http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/FB-06012009-01.pdf|here]]!
   - On 20th February 2008, Satnam Singh, a prisoner in Ludhiana’s Central Jail sent a Right to Information (RTI) request to the Supreme Court (SC) asking for a copy of its guidelines on police reforms. The Public Information Officer (PIO) of the SC denied the request and referred Singh to the SC website. Singh filed a first appeal pointing out that as a prisoner, he had no access to a computer, and that, by not sending him the information, the SC was denying him his right. Hearing the appeal, the Registrar, SC too denied the request, now asking him to apply under the Supreme Court Rules 1966, instead of the RTI Act.   - On 20th February 2008, Satnam Singh, a prisoner in Ludhiana’s Central Jail sent a Right to Information (RTI) request to the Supreme Court (SC) asking for a copy of its guidelines on police reforms. The Public Information Officer (PIO) of the SC denied the request and referred Singh to the SC website. Singh filed a first appeal pointing out that as a prisoner, he had no access to a computer, and that, by not sending him the information, the SC was denying him his right. Hearing the appeal, the Registrar, SC too denied the request, now asking him to apply under the Supreme Court Rules 1966, instead of the RTI Act.
-  - The Supreme Court Rules 1966 Rule XII {{:rules:rulexii-of-supreme-court-rules-1966.png|}}+  - The Supreme Court Rules 1966 Rule XII {{ :rules:rulexii-of-supreme-court-rules-1966.webp?537x1060 |Supreme Court of India RTI Rules — RTI Wiki}}
   - [[http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/publications/rti/rti_in_the_judiciary_series_1.pdf|An Analysis of the RTI Rules of the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court and the Subordinate Courts]]   - [[http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/publications/rti/rti_in_the_judiciary_series_1.pdf|An Analysis of the RTI Rules of the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court and the Subordinate Courts]]
   - The Commission respectfully disagrees with the decision of the then Chief Information Commissioner that the PIO, Supreme Court may choose to deny the information sought under the RTI Act and ask an applicant to apply for information under Order XII of the SC Rules.[[http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-05-15/news/29545724_1_rti-act-pio-central-information-commission|Supreme Court cannot deny information under RTI Act: CIC]]    - The Commission respectfully disagrees with the decision of the then Chief Information Commissioner that the PIO, Supreme Court may choose to deny the information sought under the RTI Act and ask an applicant to apply for information under Order XII of the SC Rules.[[http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-05-15/news/29545724_1_rti-act-pio-central-information-commission|Supreme Court cannot deny information under RTI Act: CIC]] 
   - [[http://thewire.in/2015/09/03/the-supreme-court-still-adamantly-refuses-to-yield-to-rti-9856/|The Supreme Court Still Adamantly Refuses to Yield to RTI]]   - [[http://thewire.in/2015/09/03/the-supreme-court-still-adamantly-refuses-to-yield-to-rti-9856/|The Supreme Court Still Adamantly Refuses to Yield to RTI]]
 +
 +----
 +
 +===== Currency caveat =====
 +
 +Rules listed below link to the material currently held on this site. The text may be dated. Readers who rely on these rules for a live application, appeal, or notice are advised to confirm the current rules against the relevant State Government notification on the official Government Gazette portal of the State, or against the Commission's published regulations, as the case may be.
 +
 +//Last reviewed on: 19 April 2026 — RTI Wiki editorial team.//
 +