no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(revaluation RTI, rechecking RTI, answer script RTI, Aditya Bandopadhyay, Controller of Examinations)
+metatag-description=(File RTI to **Controller of Examinations**. Ask rechecking/revaluation status, evaluator-pattern, award list for course, marks revision statistics (anonymised).)}}
+====== University result rechecking / revaluation — RTI ======
+{{:social:auto:rti-for-university-result-rechecking.png?direct&1200 |University result rechecking / revaluation — RTI — RTI Wiki}}
+{{page>snippets:dpdp-banner}}
+<WRAP info>**Direct answer.** File RTI to **Controller of Examinations**. Ask rechecking/revaluation status, evaluator-pattern, award list for course, marks revision statistics (anonymised).</WRAP>
+<WRAP collapse>
+===== Legal framework =====
+  * **State University Acts** — examination powers.
+  * **Maharashtra University Act §30** typical.
+  * **Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011)** — answer scripts disclosable.
+</WRAP>
+===== 5 questions to ask =====
+  - Rechecking/revaluation status.
+  - Evaluator-pattern (first/second/moderator).
+  - Revision statistics for the course.
+  - Projected result.
+  - Grievance-committee minutes.
+===== Template =====
+<code>
+To: The Public Information Officer, Controller of Examinations
+Subject: Application under §6 RTI Act 2005 — Result verification / revaluation
+My revaluation application No. [..] for [course] [..] is pending. Please furnish: (1) status, (2) evaluator pattern, (3) revision statistics, (4) projected result, (5) grievance-committee minutes.
+Fee: Rs.10 by IPO/cash.
+</code>
+===== Common mistakes =====
+  * Filing only at college — go to **Controller**.
+  * Not citing **roll number + subject**.
+  * Skipping **answer-script inspection** right under Aditya Bandopadhyay.
+===== Case law anchors =====
+  * **Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011)** — right to inspect answer script.
+  * **ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (2011)** — evaluator identity protected.
+===== Pro tips =====
+  * Request **answer-script inspection** as distinct remedy under RTI.
+  * Pair with **grievance redressal committee**.
+===== FAQ =====
+  * **Q: Fee for revaluation?** Set by university — RTI for policy.
+  * **Q: External examiner engagement?** RTI for **panel + rotation records**.
+===== Related reading =====
+  * [[:rti-for-answer-sheet-evaluation|Answer sheet RTI]]
+  * [[:rti-for-college-affiliation|Affiliation RTI]]
+===== Sources =====
+  - State University Acts. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011). ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (2011).
+//Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.//
+{{tag>rti for university result rechecking citizen-rti rti-template}}