Right to Information Wiki

The working reference for India's Right to Information Act, 2005.

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: Right to Information Act, 2005 — India's Working Reference » University result rechecking / revaluation — RTI
Trace: • Marriage certificate delay — RTI to municipal/SDM registrar • Stray dog / cattle menace — RTI to municipal Veterinary Officer • Vaccine stock at PHC — RTI for availability • Shop & Establishment registration delay — RTI to Labour dept • Recruitment cut-off changed mid-process — RTI for order • Traffic challan disputed — RTI • AICTE approval of engineering college — RTI to AICTE • Pothole / road not repaired — RTI to PWD/Municipal Engineering • University result rechecking / revaluation — RTI
rti-for-university-result-rechecking
Translate:

Table of Contents

University result rechecking / revaluation — RTI

⚠️ DPDP Rules, 2025 (14 Nov 2025) amended Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act — public-interest override now under Section 8(2). Read the note →

· 2026/04/19 05:02

Direct answer. File RTI to Controller of Examinations. Ask rechecking/revaluation status, evaluator-pattern, award list for course, marks revision statistics (anonymised).

  • State University Acts — examination powers.
  • Maharashtra University Act §30 typical.
  • Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011) — answer scripts disclosable.

5 questions to ask

  1. Rechecking/revaluation status.
  2. Evaluator-pattern (first/second/moderator).
  3. Revision statistics for the course.
  4. Projected result.
  5. Grievance-committee minutes.

Template

To: The Public Information Officer, Controller of Examinations
Subject: Application under §6 RTI Act 2005 — Result verification / revaluation

My revaluation application No. [..] for [course] [..] is pending. Please furnish: (1) status, (2) evaluator pattern, (3) revision statistics, (4) projected result, (5) grievance-committee minutes.

Fee: Rs.10 by IPO/cash.

Common mistakes

  • Filing only at college — go to Controller.
  • Not citing roll number + subject.
  • Skipping answer-script inspection right under Aditya Bandopadhyay.

Case law anchors

  • Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011) — right to inspect answer script.
  • ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (2011) — evaluator identity protected.

Pro tips

  • Request answer-script inspection as distinct remedy under RTI.
  • Pair with grievance redressal committee.

FAQ

  • Q: Fee for revaluation? Set by university — RTI for policy.
  • Q: External examiner engagement? RTI for panel + rotation records.

Sources

  1. State University Acts. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011). ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (2011).

Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.

, , , , , ,
Share this article
Twitter Facebook WhatsApp
Was this helpful? — views
rti-for-university-result-rechecking.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: GNU Free Documentation License 1.3
GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki

The working reference for India's Right to Information Act, 2005. Current, sourced, usable. We do not file RTIs on your behalf — we equip you to file your own.

1,161articles
408case-law rulings
1,046tags
36state guides

📰 Get the RTI Wiki digest — monthly

Important rulings, amendments, editorial. Curated. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.

@rtiindia Facebook RSS
🗺 Full sitemap — every page →

© 2005–2026 RTI Wiki. Content reviewed as of 23 April 2026. RTI Wiki is an editorial knowledge base on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — not a law firm, not a legal-advice service, not a paid filing service.

Home Sitemap Editor Editorial policy Disclaimer Privacy Press kit Contribute Contact