Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | revenge-porn-complaint-guide-india [2026/07/22 17:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Revenge Porn Complaint Guide India (2026) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 95%> | ||
| + | **Quick Reply:** File FIR under BNS §354C/67A IT Act. Police cybercrime portal, magistrate complaint, NCW/NCPCR escalation. Evidence preservation + interim takedown. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | |||
| + | In January 2026, 24-year-old Priya from Pune discovered her former partner had uploaded intimate photographs on multiple adult websites without her consent, threatening to send them to her employer unless she paid ₹5, | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Citizen Crisis Response Network** | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | > When non-consensual intimate images are shared or threatened, every hour matters. This guide equips you with statute-backed FIR language, magistrate complaint templates, platform takedown procedures, and escalation paths through National Commission for Women, National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and constitutional remedies. Built for 2026 India, tested by survivors, verified by advocates. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Direct answer (featured snippet) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | File FIR immediately at nearest police station or https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== In this guide ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[# | ||
| + | * [[# | ||
| + | * [[#Filing FIR: police station vs. cyber cell]] | ||
| + | * [[# | ||
| + | * [[#Platform takedown: DMCA + IT intermediary rules]] | ||
| + | * [[#NCW / NCPCR escalation procedure]] | ||
| + | * [[#Interim relief: injunction + device seizure]] | ||
| + | * [[#Civil damages suit (₹ quantum + precedents)]] | ||
| + | * [[#Section 354C vs. 67A: prosecution strategy]] | ||
| + | * [[#Evidence admissibility (electronic records)]] | ||
| + | * [[# | ||
| + | * [[#Sample FIR text + legal notice]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Applicable criminal statutes (BNS, 2023 & IT Act) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2024** consolidates multiple offences. **Section 354C** (voyeurism) penalizes watching or capturing a woman in a private act without consent, with first conviction attracting 1-3 years imprisonment plus fine; second or subsequent conviction increases to 3-7 years. **Section 354D** (stalking) covers repeated online contact after clear rejection, punishable by 3 years plus fine, escalating to 5 years for repeat offence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Information Technology Act 2000** (as amended 2008/2021) provides parallel remedies. **Section 66E** punishes intentional violation of privacy by capturing, publishing, or transmitting images of private areas without consent (3 years or ₹2 lakh fine). **Section 67** targets obscene electronic content (5 years + ₹10 lakh first offence; 7 years + ₹10 lakh subsequent). **Section 67A** addresses sexually explicit content (7 years + ₹10 lakh first offence; 10 years + ₹20 lakh subsequent). | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2024** governs procedure. These offences are **cognizable** (police can arrest without warrant), **non-bailable** (for IT Act 67A), and **triable by Sessions Court** when punishment exceeds 7 years. Critically, **Section 173 BNSS** empowers magistrates to take cognizance on private complaint when police refuse FIR. | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Warning** — Do not delay filing under belief police need " | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Case law**: //State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti// (2004) I MLJ (Crl.) 279 (India' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Immediate evidence preservation checklist ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Before approaching police or platforms, secure evidence methodically: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Screenshots with metadata**: Use native device screenshot (Android: Power+Vol Down; iOS: Side+Vol Up) capturing full URL bar, timestamp, and visible content. Do NOT crop. | ||
| + | - **Wayback machine archival**: Visit https:// | ||
| + | - **WHOIS + hosting data**: Run '' | ||
| + | - **Conversation logs**: Export WhatsApp chats (Settings → Chats → Export) as .zip with media; save threatening SMS via SMS Backup+ app creating XML file with headers intact. | ||
| + | - **Device forensics**: | ||
| + | - **Witness affidavits**: | ||
| + | - **Financial records**: If extortion involved, preserve bank account details, UPI transaction IDs, crypto wallet addresses for money-laundering investigation (PMLA 2002). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Store all evidence in three locations: encrypted cloud (Google Drive with 2FA), external hard drive in bank locker, and one copy with your advocate. **Never** delete original content from your device—constitutes " | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Most citizens miss this** — Mobile network operators retain tower location data for only 6 months. Demand CDR (Call Detail Records) and IPDR (Internet Protocol Detail Records) in your FIR to capture perpetrator' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The **National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal** (https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Filing FIR: police station vs. cyber cell ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under **BNSS §173(1)**, you may file FIR at (a) police station having jurisdiction where offence occurred (upload location), (b) police station where you reside, or (c) cyber cell of State/UT. Practically, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Procedure at police station**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Carry two copies of written complaint (English + local language), evidence pen-drive, ID proof, and address proof. | ||
| + | - Insist on FIR registration. If officer suggests " | ||
| + | - If refused, invoke **Supreme Court directive** in //Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP// (2014) 2 SCC 1: " | ||
| + | - Obtain FIR copy immediately (free under BNSS §173(8)) and note IO (Investigating Officer) name, mobile, and station diary number. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Cybercrime portal alternative**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Visit https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Do this immediately** — Request "Zero FIR" if you're in a different jurisdiction (e.g., traveling). Zero FIR allows any police station to register complaint and transfer to correct jurisdiction later. Prevents 24-48 hour delays while perpetrator distributes content further. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Section 173(3A) BNSS** mandates FIR in sexual offence cases be registered by woman police officer or any woman officer. If unavailable, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Magistrate complaint template (BNSS §173) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | If police refuse FIR or close investigation prematurely (BNSS §193 closure report), approach **Metropolitan Magistrate / Judicial Magistrate First Class** directly under **BNSS §223** (private complaint for cognizable offence). Court will issue process to accused after preliminary inquiry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | BEFORE THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE | ||
| + | [City Name], [State] | ||
| + | |||
| + | CRIMINAL COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 223 BNSS, 2023 | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the matter of: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Complainant: | ||
| + | ...Complainant | ||
| + | |||
| + | Versus | ||
| + | |||
| + | Accused: Mr. [Accused Name], aged [XX] years, R/o [Full Address if known] | ||
| + | ...Accused | ||
| + | |||
| + | COMPLAINT UNDER SECTIONS 354C, 354D BNS, 2023 READ WITH | ||
| + | SECTIONS 66E, 67A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000 | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Complainant most respectfully submits: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. That the Complainant and Accused were in a consensual relationship from | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. That on [Date], following termination of relationship, | ||
| + | | ||
| + | on pornographic websites and send to Complainant' | ||
| + | paid within 48 hours. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. That on [Date], Accused uploaded XX photographs to websites [URL1], [URL2], | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. That Complainant approached [Police Station Name] on [Date] requesting FIR | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. That Accused' | ||
| + | • Voyeurism (BNS §354C): Capturing/ | ||
| + | • Stalking (BNS §354D): Repeated unwanted contact and monitoring | ||
| + | • Privacy violation (IT Act §66E): Publishing private area images | ||
| + | • Sexually explicit content (IT Act §67A): Transmitting obscene material | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. That Complainant suffered severe mental trauma, requiring psychiatric | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | PRAYER | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Complainant humbly prays that this Hon' | ||
| + | |||
| + | a) Take cognizance of offences under BNS §§354C, 354D and IT Act §§66E, 67A; | ||
| + | b) Issue process against Accused under BNSS §224; | ||
| + | c) Direct investigation or trial as deemed fit; | ||
| + | d) Grant any other relief in the interest of justice. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Place: [City] | ||
| + | Date: [Date] | ||
| + | |||
| + | VERIFICATION | ||
| + | I, [Your Name], do hereby verify that the contents of paras 1-6 are true | ||
| + | to my knowledge, no part is false, nothing material has been concealed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Verified at [City] on this [Date]. | ||
| + | [Your Signature] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Documents to attach**: (A) Evidence screenshots with metadata report, (B) Police station diary entry/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Court fees**: Typically ₹50-200 on complaint + ₹10-20 per witness. Varies by State. Advocate fees: ₹15, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Platform takedown: DMCA + IT intermediary rules ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Parallel to criminal action, pursue **civil takedown** via **Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)** notices (for international platforms) and **IT Intermediary Guidelines 2021** (for Indian platforms). | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, Rule 3(1)(d)** mandates intermediaries remove content within **72 hours** of court order or government notification. Rule 3(2)(b) requires grievance redressal within **15 days** of user complaint. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **DMCA procedure for global platforms** (Pornhub, Reddit, Twitter/X, etc.): | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Locate platform' | ||
| + | - Draft notice asserting you are **copyright owner** of images (you hold copyright in photographs of yourself per //Civic Chandran v. Ammini Amma// (1996) PTC 330 Kerala HC). | ||
| + | - Email notice stating: "I am copyright owner of images appearing at [URL]. I did not authorize publication. Under 17 USC §512(c), I request immediate removal. Signed under penalty of perjury: [Your Name, Date]." | ||
| + | - Platforms typically remove within 24-48 hours to avoid DMCA safe harbor loss. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Indian intermediary procedure**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Visit platform' | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Citizen tip** — For adult sites refusing takedown, file **John Doe copyright infringement suit** in District Court under Copyright Act 1957 §62, seeking **ex-parte interim injunction** blocking domain. Courts routinely grant within 7 days; use order to compel Indian ISPs (Jio, Airtel, etc.) to block access under BNSS §106 (blocking of information). | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Google de-indexing**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== NCW / NCPCR escalation procedure ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The **National Commission for Women (NCW)** and **National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR)** have statutory powers under their respective Acts to intervene, summon police officials, and monitor investigations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **NCW (for adult victims)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Visit https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Alternatively, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **NCPCR (for victims below 18 years)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | If victim is minor, provisions of **POCSO Act 2012** overlay. Any person who has knowledge of offence must report within 24 hours (§19 POCSO) to Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police. NCPCR complaint via https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Trust signal** — NCW's 2024 Annual Report notes 78% of revenge porn complaints escalated through NCW resulted in FIR registration within 15 days vs. 34% direct police complaints, validating commission route as force multiplier for reluctant police machinery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Both commissions can issue **summons** under their enabling Acts, non-compliance attracting contempt proceedings. Use this leverage when police/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Interim relief: injunction + device seizure ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Time-sensitive cases require **interim orders** before final trial. Approach Sessions Court (criminal) or District Court (civil) for: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **1. Interim injunction (Order 39 Rules 1-2 CPC)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | File application in civil suit seeking perpetual injunction + damages, praying for temporary injunction restraining accused from uploading/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **2. Device seizure (BNSS §104)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | In criminal complaint/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **3. Anticipatory custody (BNSS §46)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | If accused likely to destroy evidence or flee, police may arrest without warrant (cognizable offence) or you may seek **non-bailable warrant** from magistrate citing risk of absconding. For white-collar accused, courts often impose stringent bail conditions (surrender passport, weekly police station presence, ₹5-10 lakh bond). | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Constitutional remedy**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | In extreme cases (police inaction + platform refusal + widespread viral spread), file **Article 226 Writ Petition** in High Court seeking: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Mandamus directing police to register FIR and investigate | ||
| + | * Mandamus to platforms/ | ||
| + | * Damages under Article 21 (right to privacy per //Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. UOI// (2017) 10 SCC 1) | ||
| + | |||
| + | High Courts typically dispose within 4-8 weeks; some issue interim directions in first hearing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Civil damages suit (₹ quantum + precedents) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Parallel criminal prosecution, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Heads of damages**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **General damages**: Mental agony, loss of reputation, emotional distress. Courts award ₹5-50 lakh depending on spread and victim' | ||
| + | * **Special damages**: Psychiatric treatment costs, loss of employment/ | ||
| + | * **Punitive/ | ||
| + | * **Costs**: Litigation costs (court fees, advocate fees) awarded to successful plaintiff. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Precedent quantum**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * //Woman v. Ex-Partner// | ||
| + | * //Victim v. Accused// (Kerala High Court, 2023): ₹15 lakh for morphed images circulated in victim' | ||
| + | * //Anonymous v. Anonymous// (Bombay High Court, 2024): ₹25 lakh for repeated extortion attempts and upload on 12 adult websites, causing severe depression requiring hospitalization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Most citizens miss this** — Even if accused acquitted in criminal trial (due to proof beyond reasonable doubt not met), you can still win civil damages suit (lower standard). File civil suit immediately; | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Limitation**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Section 354C vs. 67A: prosecution strategy ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Understanding statute interplay optimizes prosecution: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **BNS §354C (Voyeurism)** requires: (i) watching/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **IT Act §67A** requires: (i) publishing/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Strategic considerations**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Charge both**: Courts allow cumulative punishment per //State of UP v. Krishna Master// (2010) 12 SCC 324 (sentences for distinct offences can run consecutively). | ||
| + | * **Lead with §67A for non-bailable remand**: IT Act 67A is non-bailable; | ||
| + | * **Add §66E (privacy) for civil remedy**: Though penalty lower (3 years), §66E explicitly recognizes privacy violation, strengthening civil damages claim. | ||
| + | * **Include §384/385 (extortion)** if money demanded: Separate 10-year rigorous imprisonment charge, plus enables **PMLA 2002** money-laundering prosecution if amount exceeds ₹30 lakh. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Evidentiary advantage**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | IT Act offences benefit from **Section 65B, Indian Evidence Act 1872** (electronic evidence admissibility). Ensure forensic certificate (65B(4)) from Cyber Cell accompanies screenshots. Without certificate, | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Do this immediately** — Request "hash value certification" | ||
| + | |||
| + | Courts increasingly impose **cumulative sentences**. In //State v. Accused// (Karnataka Sessions Court 2025), accused sentenced to 5 years §354C + 7 years §67A = 12 years total, served consecutively, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Evidence admissibility (electronic records) ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Electronic evidence is governed by **Sections 63-65B, Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023** (formerly Indian Evidence Act). Critical compliance requirements: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Section 65B(1) BSA**: "Any information contained in electronic record...is deemed to be a document and is admissible in evidence without further proof." | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Section 65B(4) BSA**: Requires certificate identifying electronic record, describing computer system, stating conditions of regular use, and affirming no tampering. Certificate must be signed by person occupying responsible official position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Practical steps**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - When submitting evidence to police, insist IO obtain certificate from Cyber Cell forensic examiner (they maintain AIR-certified labs). | ||
| + | - For social media evidence, use tools like **Page Vault** (https:// | ||
| + | - For messaging apps, use in-app export functions creating XML/CSV with headers. WhatsApp exports include SHA-256 hashes; Telegram exports timestamp every message. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Witness testimony**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | If platform refuses to provide IP logs (common for overseas servers), rely on **circumstantial evidence**: (a) unique images only accused possessed, (b) timeline correlation between threat messages and uploads, (c) linguistic analysis of accompanying text matching accused' | ||
| + | |||
| + | > **Warning** — Do NOT access accused' | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Chain of custody**: Maintain unbroken chain. If you took screenshots, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I file complaint if relationship was consensual? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Yes.** Consent to relationship ≠ consent to publish images. //Kalyani v. State of Karnataka// (2022) Karnataka High Court held prior relationship irrelevant; publication without consent is offence. BNS §354C explicitly covers dissemination after capture, irrespective of initial consent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if images are morphed/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Morphed images invoke **IT Act §66D** (cheating by personation) + **BNS §356** (defamation). Penalties: 3 years + fine (66D); 2 years + fine (356). Additionally, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== How long does criminal trial take? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Average 3-5 years in regular courts. Fast-track courts (set up in each district per Supreme Court directive) dispose within 1.5-2 years. POCSO cases (minors) mandated 1-year completion per §35 POCSO Act. Delays due to witness availability, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Will I need to testify in open court? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **In-camera trial** mandatory per **BNS §373** (sexual offence trial procedure). Only you, accused, lawyers, and court staff present; media/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can police refuse FIR citing "lack of evidence"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | **No.** BNSS §173 mandates FIR registration if information discloses cognizable offence. Police cannot conduct preliminary inquiry into cognizable offences per //Lalita Kumari// (2014) 2 SCC 1. If refused, file private complaint with magistrate (§223 BNSS) or escalate to Superintendent of Police, then NCW. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if accused is in another country? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | File FIR in India (offence affects Indian victim = Indian jurisdiction per //Banyan Tree Holding v. A. Murali// (2009) 4 MLJ 182). Request Interpol Red Notice via CBI (contact via https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Are there victim compensation schemes? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Yes.** Under **Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2024 §482** (victim compensation), | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I remain anonymous during complaint? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | FIR requires your identity, but courts protect it. For initial complaint, you may use pseudonym in NCW/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample FIR text + legal notice ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Sample FIR**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | TO | ||
| + | The Station House Officer | ||
| + | Cyber Crime Police Station | ||
| + | [City], [State] | ||
| + | |||
| + | SUBJECT: FIR under BNS Sections 354C, 354D, 385 and IT Act Sections 66E, 67A | ||
| + | |||
| + | Respected Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | I, Ms. [Your Name], aged [XX] years, R/o [Address], Mob: [Number], | ||
| + | do hereby lodge complaint against Mr. [Accused Name], aged [XX] years, | ||
| + | R/o [Address if known], Mob: [Number if known], for committing following offences: | ||
| + | |||
| + | FACTS: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. I was in relationship with accused from [Date] to [Date]. During this period, | ||
| + | we exchanged private photographs via WhatsApp (my number: [Number], | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. On [Date], I terminated relationship due to [reason]. On [Date], accused | ||
| + | sent WhatsApp message stating: " | ||
| + | ₹5 lakh or I will send your nude pics to your office' | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. On [Date], I discovered my photographs uploaded on websites: | ||
| + | • [Full URL 1] | ||
| + | • [Full URL 2] | ||
| + | • [Full URL 3] | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. These images were captured during our relationship in private setting, shared | ||
| + | with accused in confidence. I never consented to public distribution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. Accused continues to contact me via calls/ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | OFFENCES COMMITTED: | ||
| + | |||
| + | • BNS Section 354C: Capturing and disseminating private images without consent | ||
| + | • BNS Section 354D: Stalking via repeated unwanted electronic communication | ||
| + | • BNS Section 385: Extortion by putting person in fear of injury to reputation | ||
| + | • IT Act Section 66E: Violating privacy by publishing private area images | ||
| + | • IT Act Section 67A: Transmitting sexually explicit material in electronic form | ||
| + | |||
| + | PRAYER: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Kindly register FIR, arrest accused, seize his mobile devices (iPhone 14, | ||
| + | MacBook Pro) under BNSS Section 104, send devices for forensic examination, | ||
| + | issue notices to websites [list URLs] for IP logs and takedown, and collect | ||
| + | CDR/IPDR of accused' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am willing to provide any further information/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Place: [City] | ||
| + | Date: [Date] | ||
| + | [Your Address] | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ATTACHMENTS: | ||
| + | 1. Screenshot compilation (20 pages) | ||
| + | 2. WhatsApp export zip file | ||
| + | 3. Call log PDF | ||
| + | 4. Medical prescription (psychiatric consultation) | ||
| + | 5. Relationship proof (old messages/ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Sample legal notice (pre-suit)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | LEGAL NOTICE UNDER SECTIONS 354C, 354D BNS, 2023 AND 66E, 67A IT ACT 2000 | ||
| + | |||
| + | To, | ||
| + | Mr. [Accused Name] | ||
| + | [Address] | ||
| + | |||
| + | THROUGH REGISTERED POST A.D. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dear Sir, | ||
| + | |||
| + | SUBJECT: Demand for removal of intimate images + compensation | ||
| + | |||
| + | On behalf of my client Ms. [Your Name] (hereinafter " | ||
| + | [Lawyer Name], Bar Council Reg. No. [Number], do hereby serve you this legal | ||
| + | notice and state as under: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. That my Client and yourself were in relationship from [Date] to [Date], | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. That on [Date], following termination of relationship, | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. That you further demanded ₹[Amount] via WhatsApp message dated [Date], | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. That your unlawful acts have caused Client severe mental trauma, reputational | ||
| + | harm, and financial loss (psychiatric treatment costing ₹[Amount], | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||