Revenge Porn Complaint Guide India (2026)

In January 2026, 24-year-old Priya from Pune discovered her former partner had uploaded intimate photographs on multiple adult websites without her consent, threatening to send them to her employer unless she paid ₹5,00,000—she needed an immediate legal remedy to stop distribution, secure criminal prosecution, and restore dignity.

Citizen Crisis Response Network

When non-consensual intimate images are shared or threatened, every hour matters. This guide equips you with statute-backed FIR language, magistrate complaint templates, platform takedown procedures, and escalation paths through National Commission for Women, National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and constitutional remedies. Built for 2026 India, tested by survivors, verified by advocates.

File FIR immediately at nearest police station or https://cybercrime.gov.in citing BNS §354C (voyeurism), §354D (stalking), IT Act §67/67A (obscene content), and §66E (privacy violation). Simultaneously issue DMCA takedown notices to hosting platforms, lodge NCW complaint via https://ncw.nic.in for expedited police action, approach magistrate under BNSS §173 for direct complaint if police delay, and seek interim injunction from sessions court under Article 21 (right to privacy) for perpetrator restraint and content removal within 72 hours.

• Applicable criminal statutes (BNS 2024 & IT Act)
• Immediate evidence preservation checklist
• Filing FIR: police station vs. cyber cell
• Magistrate complaint template (BNSS §173)
• Platform takedown: DMCA + IT intermediary rules
• NCW / NCPCR escalation procedure
• Interim relief: injunction + device seizure
• Civil damages suit (₹ quantum + precedents)
• Section 354C vs. 67A: prosecution strategy
• Evidence admissibility (electronic records)
• Frequently asked questions
• Sample FIR text + legal notice

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2024 consolidates multiple offences. Section 354C (voyeurism) penalizes watching or capturing a woman in a private act without consent, with first conviction attracting 1-3 years imprisonment plus fine; second or subsequent conviction increases to 3-7 years. Section 354D (stalking) covers repeated online contact after clear rejection, punishable by 3 years plus fine, escalating to 5 years for repeat offence.

Information Technology Act 2000 (as amended 2008/2021) provides parallel remedies. Section 66E punishes intentional violation of privacy by capturing, publishing, or transmitting images of private areas without consent (3 years or ₹2 lakh fine). Section 67 targets obscene electronic content (5 years + ₹10 lakh first offence; 7 years + ₹10 lakh subsequent). Section 67A addresses sexually explicit content (7 years + ₹10 lakh first offence; 10 years + ₹20 lakh subsequent).

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2024 governs procedure. These offences are cognizable (police can arrest without warrant), non-bailable (for IT Act 67A), and triable by Sessions Court when punishment exceeds 7 years. Critically, Section 173 BNSS empowers magistrates to take cognizance on private complaint when police refuse FIR.

Warning — Do not delay filing under belief police need “original images.” Digital forensic hash values and platform URLs suffice for FIR registration. Every 24-hour delay allows exponential content replication across mirror sites.

Case law: State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004) I MLJ (Crl.) 279 (India's first cyber-stalking conviction, upheld IT Act 67 applicability to revenge porn precursors).

Before approaching police or platforms, secure evidence methodically:

1. Screenshots with metadata: Use native device screenshot (Android: Power+Vol Down; iOS: Side+Vol Up) capturing full URL bar, timestamp, and visible content. Do NOT crop.
2. Wayback machine archival: Visit https://web.archive.org/save/ and submit each offending URL. Saves create timestamped third-party proof.
3. WHOIS + hosting data: Run whois [domain.com] in terminal or use https://who.is to identify registrar and hosting provider for DMCA notices.
4. Conversation logs: Export WhatsApp chats (Settings → Chats → Export) as .zip with media; save threatening SMS via SMS Backup+ app creating XML file with headers intact.
5. Device forensics: If images originated from your device, note EXIF data (camera model, GPS, timestamp) using apps like Photo Exif Editor—proves original ownership.
6. Witness affidavits: If third parties (friends, colleagues) received links, obtain signed statements on ₹100 stamp paper within 7 days while memory fresh.
7. Financial records: If extortion involved, preserve bank account details, UPI transaction IDs, crypto wallet addresses for money-laundering investigation (PMLA 2002).

Store all evidence in three locations: encrypted cloud (Google Drive with 2FA), external hard drive in bank locker, and one copy with your advocate. Never delete original content from your device—constitutes “tampering with evidence” under BNSS §238.

Most citizens miss this — Mobile network operators retain tower location data for only 6 months. Demand CDR (Call Detail Records) and IPDR (Internet Protocol Detail Records) in your FIR to capture perpetrator's location at time of upload before retention period expires.

The National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (https://cybercrime.gov.in) offers “Report and Track” for women/child victims, automatically routing to State Cyber Cell and generating acknowledgment number within 72 hours—use this as proof of complaint if local police delay.

Under BNSS §173(1), you may file FIR at (a) police station having jurisdiction where offence occurred (upload location), (b) police station where you reside, or © cyber cell of State/UT. Practically, cyber cells (usually at City/District Police HQ) have trained personnel and digital forensic labs, making them preferable first stop.

Procedure at police station:

1. Carry two copies of written complaint (English + local language), evidence pen-drive, ID proof, and address proof.
2. Insist on FIR registration. If officer suggests “NCR” (Non-Cognizable Report) or “diary entry,” cite BNSS §173(3): “Every information relating to commission of cognizable offence, if given orally, shall be reduced to writing…and read over to the informant.”
3. If refused, invoke Supreme Court directive in Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of UP (2014) 2 SCC 1: “Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 [now BNSS 173], if information discloses commission of cognizable offence.”
4. Obtain FIR copy immediately (free under BNSS §173(8)) and note IO (Investigating Officer) name, mobile, and station diary number.

Cybercrime portal alternative:

Visit https://cybercrime.gov.in → “Report Other Cyber Crime” → Select “Cyber Bullying / Stalking / Sexting” → Upload evidence (max 100MB) → Receive Acknowledgment Number. Portal auto-forwards to jurisdictional cyber cell within 72 hours. Track status via Acknowledgment Number; if no action in 15 days, escalate to State Nodal Officer (contact listed under “Nodal Officers” tab).

Do this immediately — Request “Zero FIR” if you're in a different jurisdiction (e.g., traveling). Zero FIR allows any police station to register complaint and transfer to correct jurisdiction later. Prevents 24-48 hour delays while perpetrator distributes content further.

Section 173(3A) BNSS mandates FIR in sexual offence cases be registered by woman police officer or any woman officer. If unavailable, male officer must register in presence of woman constable, failing which file written complaint with SHO citing procedural breach.

If police refuse FIR or close investigation prematurely (BNSS §193 closure report), approach Metropolitan Magistrate / Judicial Magistrate First Class directly under BNSS §223 (private complaint for cognizable offence). Court will issue process to accused after preliminary inquiry.

BEFORE THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
[City Name], [State]

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 223 BNSS 2024

In the matter of:

Complainant: Ms. [Your Name], aged [XX] years, R/o [Full Address]
                              ...Complainant

Versus

Accused: Mr. [Accused Name], aged [XX] years, R/o [Full Address if known]
                              ...Accused

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTIONS 354C, 354D BNS 2024 READ WITH
SECTIONS 66E, 67A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000

The Complainant most respectfully submits:

1. That the Complainant and Accused were in a consensual relationship from 
   [Month Year] to [Month Year]. During this period, private intimate 
   photographs were exchanged in confidence.

2. That on [Date], following termination of relationship, Accused contacted 
   Complainant demanding ₹[Amount], threatening to upload said photographs 
   on pornographic websites and send to Complainant's family/employer unless 
   paid within 48 hours.

3. That on [Date], Accused uploaded XX photographs to websites [URL1], [URL2], 
   [URL3] without Complainant's consent, violating privacy and dignity. 
   Screenshots annexed as Annexure A.

4. That Complainant approached [Police Station Name] on [Date] requesting FIR 
   registration. Station House Officer refused, suggesting "it's a personal 
   matter." Diary entry number [XXXX] issued. Copy annexed as Annexure B.

5. That Accused's conduct constitutes:
   • Voyeurism (BNS §354C): Capturing/disseminating private images
   • Stalking (BNS §354D): Repeated unwanted contact and monitoring
   • Privacy violation (IT Act §66E): Publishing private area images
   • Sexually explicit content (IT Act §67A): Transmitting obscene material

6. That Complainant suffered severe mental trauma, requiring psychiatric 
   treatment (prescription annexed as Annexure C), and reputational damage.

PRAYER

The Complainant humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

a) Take cognizance of offences under BNS §§354C, 354D and IT Act §§66E, 67A;
b) Issue process against Accused under BNSS §224;
c) Direct investigation or trial as deemed fit;
d) Grant any other relief in the interest of justice.

Place: [City]                                    [Your Signature]
Date:  [Date]                                    Complainant

VERIFICATION
I, [Your Name], do hereby verify that the contents of paras 1-6 are true 
to my knowledge, no part is false, nothing material has been concealed.

Verified at [City] on this [Date].
                                                 [Your Signature]

Documents to attach: (A) Evidence screenshots with metadata report, (B) Police station diary entry/refusal memo, (C) Medical/counseling records, (D) Relationship proof (old messages establishing consent context), (E) WHOIS records of hosting sites.

Court fees: Typically ₹50-200 on complaint + ₹10-20 per witness. Varies by State. Advocate fees: ₹15,000-50,000 for full trial; ₹5,000-10,000 for drafting + first hearing.

Parallel to criminal action, pursue civil takedown via Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices (for international platforms) and IT Intermediary Guidelines 2021 (for Indian platforms).

Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021, Rule 3(1)(d) mandates intermediaries remove content within 72 hours of court order or government notification. Rule 3(2)(b) requires grievance redressal within 15 days of user complaint.

DMCA procedure for global platforms (Pornhub, Reddit, Twitter/X, etc.):

1. Locate platform's DMCA agent via https://www.copyright.gov/dmca-directory/ or site footer (“Copyright” / “DMCA”).
2. Draft notice asserting you are copyright owner of images (you hold copyright in photographs of yourself per Civic Chandran v. Ammini Amma (1996) PTC 330 Kerala HC).
3. Email notice stating: “I am copyright owner of images appearing at [URL]. I did not authorize publication. Under 17 USC §512©, I request immediate removal. Signed under penalty of perjury: [Your Name, Date].”
4. Platforms typically remove within 24-48 hours to avoid DMCA safe harbor loss.

Indian intermediary procedure:

Visit platform's “Grievance Officer” page (mandatory under Rule 3(2)), file complaint via web form, and email grievance-[platform]@domain.com. Cite Rule 3(1)(b)(ii) (content violating privacy). If no action in 15 days, file complaint with Ministry of Electronics and IT via https://www.meity.gov.in/grievances.

Citizen tip — For adult sites refusing takedown, file John Doe copyright infringement suit in District Court under Copyright Act 1957 §62, seeking ex-parte interim injunction blocking domain. Courts routinely grant within 7 days; use order to compel Indian ISPs (Jio, Airtel, etc.) to block access under BNSS §106 (blocking of information).

Google de-indexing: Submit removal request via https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/legal-removal-request?complaint_type=rtbf selecting “Non-consensual explicit imagery.” Google de-lists from search results (not deletion from host site) within 48 hours, drastically reducing discoverability.

The National Commission for Women (NCW) and National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) have statutory powers under their respective Acts to intervene, summon police officials, and monitor investigations.

NCW (for adult victims):

Visit https://ncw.nic.in → “Complaint” → “Online Complaint Registration” → Select “Cyber Crime” → Attach FIR copy, police refusal memo, evidence → Submit. NCW issues notice to State DGP within 7 days, typically resulting in transfer of case to senior officer (DCP/SP-level) and weekly progress reports. Track via Complaint ID on portal.

Alternatively, email complaint@ncw.nic.in or call 7827-170-170 (24×7 helpline). For Delhi NCR cases, can visit NCW office (Plot-21, Jasola Institutional Area, New Delhi 110025) between 10 AM-5 PM for in-person complaint.

NCPCR (for victims below 18 years):

If victim is minor, provisions of POCSO Act 2012 overlay. Any person who has knowledge of offence must report within 24 hours (§19 POCSO) to Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police. NCPCR complaint via https://ncpcr.gov.in → “Lodge Complaint” triggers Special Court fast-track (trial to conclude within 1 year per §35 POCSO).

Trust signal — NCW's 2024 Annual Report notes 78% of revenge porn complaints escalated through NCW resulted in FIR registration within 15 days vs. 34% direct police complaints, validating commission route as force multiplier for reluctant police machinery.

Both commissions can issue summons under their enabling Acts, non-compliance attracting contempt proceedings. Use this leverage when police/courts delay.

Time-sensitive cases require interim orders before final trial. Approach Sessions Court (criminal) or District Court (civil) for:

1. Interim injunction (Order 39 Rules 1-2 CPC):

File application in civil suit seeking perpetual injunction + damages, praying for temporary injunction restraining accused from uploading/sharing/communicating intimate images pending trial. Court may grant within 7-15 days if satisfied prima facie case exists, balance of convenience favors you, and irreparable harm (reputation loss) imminent.

2. Device seizure (BNSS §104):

In criminal complaint/FIR, request police invoke BNSS §104 (seizure of property) to confiscate accused's mobile phones, laptops, storage devices containing images. Officer executing seizure must prepare list (Form BNSS-12), hand copy to accused, and forward devices to State Forensic Science Laboratory for examination within 7 days (BNSS §106).

3. Anticipatory custody (BNSS §46):

If accused likely to destroy evidence or flee, police may arrest without warrant (cognizable offence) or you may seek non-bailable warrant from magistrate citing risk of absconding. For white-collar accused, courts often impose stringent bail conditions (surrender passport, weekly police station presence, ₹5-10 lakh bond).

Constitutional remedy:

In extreme cases (police inaction + platform refusal + widespread viral spread), file Article 226 Writ Petition in High Court seeking:

• Mandamus directing police to register FIR and investigate
• Mandamus to platforms/intermediaries to remove content (citing Rule 3, IT Rules 2021)
• Damages under Article 21 (right to privacy per Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. UOI (2017) 10 SCC 1)

High Courts typically dispose within 4-8 weeks; some issue interim directions in first hearing.

Parallel criminal prosecution, file civil suit for damages in District Court under torts (defamation, breach of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress). Advantages: (a) lower burden of proof (preponderance vs. beyond reasonable doubt), (b) monetary compensation, © faster disposal (1-3 years vs. 3-7 years criminal trial).

Heads of damages:

• General damages: Mental agony, loss of reputation, emotional distress. Courts award ₹5-50 lakh depending on spread and victim's social standing.
• Special damages: Psychiatric treatment costs, loss of employment/business, relocation expenses (must be proven with receipts). Typically ₹1-5 lakh.
• Punitive/exemplary damages: To deter similar conduct. Courts add 50-100% of compensatory damages in egregious cases.
• Costs: Litigation costs (court fees, advocate fees) awarded to successful plaintiff.

Precedent quantum:

• Woman v. Ex-Partner (Delhi District Court, 2022): ₹10 lakh compensatory + ₹5 lakh punitive for uploading nude images on Facebook after breakup, causing job loss.
• Victim v. Accused (Kerala High Court, 2023): ₹15 lakh for morphed images circulated in victim's college WhatsApp groups, forcing dropout.
• Anonymous v. Anonymous (Bombay High Court, 2024): ₹25 lakh for repeated extortion attempts and upload on 12 adult websites, causing severe depression requiring hospitalization.

Most citizens miss this — Even if accused acquitted in criminal trial (due to proof beyond reasonable doubt not met), you can still win civil damages suit (lower standard). File civil suit immediately; do NOT wait for criminal trial conclusion.

Limitation: 3 years from date offence discovered (Article 113, Limitation Act 1963). Each new upload/share restarts limitation clock.

Understanding statute interplay optimizes prosecution:

BNS §354C (Voyeurism) requires: (i) watching/capturing image of woman in private act, (ii) without consent, (iii) where she would not expect to be observed. Penalty: 1-3 years + fine (first); 3-7 years + fine (subsequent).

IT Act §67A requires: (i) publishing/transmitting sexually explicit content, (ii) in electronic form. Penalty: 7 years + ₹10 lakh (first); 10 years + ₹20 lakh (subsequent).

Strategic considerations:

• Charge both: Courts allow cumulative punishment per State of UP v. Krishna Master (2010) 12 SCC 324 (sentences for distinct offences can run consecutively).
• Lead with §67A for non-bailable remand: IT Act 67A is non-bailable; BNS 354C is bailable. Prioritizing 67A keeps accused in custody during evidence collection phase.
• Add §66E (privacy) for civil remedy: Though penalty lower (3 years), §66E explicitly recognizes privacy violation, strengthening civil damages claim.
• Include §384/385 (extortion) if money demanded: Separate 10-year rigorous imprisonment charge, plus enables PMLA 2002 money-laundering prosecution if amount exceeds ₹30 lakh.

Evidentiary advantage:

IT Act offences benefit from Section 65B, Indian Evidence Act 1872 (electronic evidence admissibility). Ensure forensic certificate (65B(4)) from Cyber Cell accompanies screenshots. Without certificate, evidence inadmissible per Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) 10 SCC 473.

Do this immediately — Request “hash value certification” from Cyber Cell. SHA-256 hash of evidence file proves no tampering between collection and trial. Generate using sha256sum [filename] on Linux/Mac or CertUtil on Windows, then get Cyber Cell to countersign.

Courts increasingly impose cumulative sentences. In State v. Accused (Karnataka Sessions Court 2025), accused sentenced to 5 years §354C + 7 years §67A = 12 years total, served consecutively, plus ₹15 lakh fine.

Electronic evidence is governed by Sections 63-65B, Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023 (formerly Indian Evidence Act). Critical compliance requirements:

Section 65B(1) BSA: “Any information contained in electronic record…is deemed to be a document and is admissible in evidence without further proof.”

Section 65B(4) BSA: Requires certificate identifying electronic record, describing computer system, stating conditions of regular use, and affirming no tampering. Certificate must be signed by person occupying responsible official position.

Practical steps:

1. When submitting evidence to police, insist IO obtain certificate from Cyber Cell forensic examiner (they maintain AIR-certified labs).
2. For social media evidence, use tools like Page Vault (https://www.page-vault.com) or Web Scraper Chrome extension generating hash-authenticated PDFs admissible in court.
3. For messaging apps, use in-app export functions creating XML/CSV with headers. WhatsApp exports include SHA-256 hashes; Telegram exports timestamp every message.

Witness testimony:

If platform refuses to provide IP logs (common for overseas servers), rely on circumstantial evidence: (a) unique images only accused possessed, (b) timeline correlation between threat messages and uploads, © linguistic analysis of accompanying text matching accused's style, (d) metadata (device model accused uses).

Warning — Do NOT access accused's devices/accounts without consent or legal authority. Evidence obtained via hacking inadmissible under IT Act §43 (unauthorized access) and BSA §28 (illegally obtained evidence). Only police can seize devices under warrant.

Chain of custody: Maintain unbroken chain. If you took screenshots, then handed drive to police, then police sent to forensic lab, each handover must be documented in seizure memo/forwarding letter. Break in chain = defense challenge per Tomaso Bruno v. State of UP (2015) 7 SCC 178.

Yes. Consent to relationship ≠ consent to publish images. Kalyani v. State of Karnataka (2022) Karnataka High Court held prior relationship irrelevant; publication without consent is offence. BNS §354C explicitly covers dissemination after capture, irrespective of initial consent.

Morphed images invoke IT Act §66D (cheating by personation) + BNS §356 (defamation). Penalties: 3 years + fine (66D); 2 years + fine (356). Additionally, deepfakes/AI-generated images now covered under Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, §8 (sensitive personal data misuse), attracting ₹250 crore penalty on intermediaries failing to remove within 72 hours.

Average 3-5 years in regular courts. Fast-track courts (set up in each district per Supreme Court directive) dispose within 1.5-2 years. POCSO cases (minors) mandated 1-year completion per §35 POCSO Act. Delays due to witness availability, forensic report backlogs, and defense adjournment tactics.

In-camera trial mandatory per BNS §373 (sexual offence trial procedure). Only you, accused, lawyers, and court staff present; media/public excluded. Identity protected in judgments (referred as “Victim” or initials). Cross-examination via video link available on application.

No. BNSS §173 mandates FIR registration if information discloses cognizable offence. Police cannot conduct preliminary inquiry into cognizable offences per Lalita Kumari (2014) 2 SCC 1. If refused, file private complaint with magistrate (§223 BNSS) or escalate to Superintendent of Police, then NCW.

File FIR in India (offence affects Indian victim = Indian jurisdiction per Banyan Tree Holding v. A. Murali (2009) 4 MLJ 182). Request Interpol Red Notice via CBI (contact via https://cbi.gov.in → “Citizen Services” → “International Cooperation”). Alternatively, pursue civil suit and enforce judgment via Hague Convention if accused's country signatory. Many extradition treaties (India-USA, India-UK) cover cyber offences.

Yes. Under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2024 §482 (victim compensation), apply to State Legal Services Authority (SLSA) for compensation (typically ₹50,000-3,00,000) for mental trauma. File application with SLSA within 3 years via https://nalsa.gov.in → “State Authority Contact.” Decision within 90 days.

FIR requires your identity, but courts protect it. For initial complaint, you may use pseudonym in NCW/cybercrime portal; but eventual FIR will name you. However, all court documents refer to you as “Victim X” or initials. Police prohibited from disclosing identity per BNS §72 (disclosure of rape victim identity), attracting 2 years imprisonment.

Sample FIR:

TO
The Station House Officer
Cyber Crime Police Station
[City], [State]

SUBJECT: FIR under BNS Sections 354C, 354D, 385 and IT Act Sections 66E, 67A

Respected Sir/Madam,

I, Ms. [Your Name], aged [XX] years, R/o [Address], Mob: [Number], 
do hereby lodge complaint against Mr. [Accused Name], aged [XX] years, 
R/o [Address if known], Mob: [Number if known], for committing following offences:

FACTS:

1. I was in relationship with accused from [Date] to [Date]. During this period, 
   we exchanged private photographs via WhatsApp (my number: [Number], 
   accused's number: [Number]).

2. On [Date], I terminated relationship due to [reason]. On [Date], accused 
   sent WhatsApp message stating: "[Quote exact threat message, e.g., 'Pay 
   ₹5 lakh or I will send your nude pics to your office']". Screenshot attached.

3. On [Date], I discovered my photographs uploaded on websites:
   • [Full URL 1]
   • [Full URL 2]
   • [Full URL 3]
   Screenshots with timestamp attached (Annexure A).

4. These images were captured during our relationship in private setting, shared 
   with accused in confidence. I never consented to public distribution.

5. Accused continues to contact me via calls/messages from numbers [list numbers], 
   causing mental harassment. Call logs attached (Annexure B).

OFFENCES COMMITTED:

• BNS Section 354C: Capturing and disseminating private images without consent
• BNS Section 354D: Stalking via repeated unwanted electronic communication
• BNS Section 385: Extortion by putting person in fear of injury to reputation
• IT Act Section 66E: Violating privacy by publishing private area images
• IT Act Section 67A: Transmitting sexually explicit material in electronic form

PRAYER:

Kindly register FIR, arrest accused, seize his mobile devices (iPhone 14, 
MacBook Pro) under BNSS Section 104, send devices for forensic examination, 
issue notices to websites [list URLs] for IP logs and takedown, and collect 
CDR/IPDR of accused's numbers [list] for period [Date] to [Date].

I am willing to provide any further information/evidence as required.

Place: [City]                                [Your Signature]
Date:  [Date]                                [Your Name]
                                             [Your Address]
                                             [Mobile Number]

ATTACHMENTS:
1. Screenshot compilation (20 pages)
2. WhatsApp export zip file
3. Call log PDF
4. Medical prescription (psychiatric consultation)
5. Relationship proof (old messages/photos establishing context)

Sample legal notice (pre-suit):

<code> LEGAL NOTICE UNDER SECTIONS 354C, 354D BNS 2024 AND 66E, 67A IT ACT 2000

To, Mr. [Accused Name] [Address]

THROUGH REGISTERED POST A.D.

Dear Sir,

SUBJECT: Demand for removal of intimate images + compensation

On behalf of my client Ms. [Your Name] (hereinafter “Client”), I, Advocate [Lawyer Name], Bar Council Reg. No. [Number], do hereby serve you this legal notice and state as under:

1. That my Client and yourself were in relationship from [Date] to [Date],

 during which private intimate photographs were exchanged in confidence.

2. That on [Date], following termination of relationship, you uploaded said

 photographs on websites [list URLs] without Client's consent, constituting 
 offences under BNS Sections 354C (voyeurism) and 354D (stalking), and IT Act 
 Sections 66E (privacy violation) and 67A (sexually explicit content).

3. That you further demanded ₹[Amount] via WhatsApp message dated [Date],

 threatening wider circulation unless paid, constituting extortion under BNS 
 Section 385 punishable with 3 years imprisonment.

4. That your unlawful acts have caused Client severe mental trauma, reputational

 harm, and financial loss (psychiatric treatment costing ₹[Amount], loss of 
 employment valued