recruitment-results-rti
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | recruitment-results-rti [2026/04/23 02:08] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Recruitment exam result / cut-off / merit-list / answer-key disputed. RTI to conducting body. Template + case law (2026).) | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Recruitment Results RTI — answer-key, cut-off, merit-list (2026))}} | ||
| + | ====== Recruitment Results RTI — answer-key, cut-off, merit-list (2026) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | Recruitment exam result / cut-off / merit-list / answer-key disputed. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why this RTI works ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Recruitment exam result / cut-off / merit-list / answer-key disputed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Legal framework ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **RTI Act, 2005** §6, §7(1). | ||
| + | * **Recruitment Notification** of the conducting body. | ||
| + | * **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011)** — answer-sheets are information. | ||
| + | * **ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011)** — fiduciary narrowed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== RTI template — copy & file ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To: | ||
| + | The Public Information Officer (PIO), | ||
| + | [Office name + address]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: RTI under §6 — Recruitment Results query | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir/Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under the RTI Act, 2005, kindly provide: | ||
| + | 1. Final answer-key for [EXAM], date [DATE], with question-wise corrections. | ||
| + | 2. Cut-off mark category-wise. | ||
| + | 3. Merit-list (anonymised by Roll No.) and individual scorecard for Roll [NO]. | ||
| + | 4. Marks / answers awarded for disputed Q. No. [NUMBER]. | ||
| + | 5. Reasons for any post-key changes. | ||
| + | Rs. 10 IPO enclosed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yours faithfully, | ||
| + | [Name] | ||
| + | [Address + phone + email] | ||
| + | [Date] | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Escalation timeline ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Day 31** First Appeal. | ||
| + | * **Day 76** Second Appeal to CIC. | ||
| + | * **Parallel** Conducting body's representation cell; CAT (Central Admin Tribunal) for Govt jobs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Case law anchors ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011)** — Answer-sheets disclosable. | ||
| + | * **ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011)** — Fiduciary defence narrowed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Forgetting Roll No. | ||
| + | * Asking for evaluator identity (§8(1)(g)). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I challenge cut-off? ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes — via CAT/HC. RTI is the foundation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related reading ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:faq|RTI — 25 questions answered]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * RTI Act, 2005 — full text. | ||
| + | * Citation chain in body. | ||
| + | * Citizen Charter of the relevant authority. | ||
| + | * Case-law database at [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag> | ||
Was this helpful?
— views
Thanks for the signal.
recruitment-results-rti.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
