Recruitment exam result / cut-off / merit-list / answer-key disputed.

• RTI Act, 2005 §6, §7(1).
• Recruitment Notification of the conducting body.
• CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011) — answer-sheets are information.
• ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011) — fiduciary narrowed.

To:
The Public Information Officer (PIO),
[Office name + address].

Subject: RTI under §6 — Recruitment Results query

Sir/Madam,

Under the RTI Act, 2005, kindly provide:
1. Final answer-key for [EXAM], date [DATE], with question-wise corrections.
2. Cut-off mark category-wise.
3. Merit-list (anonymised by Roll No.) and individual scorecard for Roll [NO].
4. Marks / answers awarded for disputed Q. No. [NUMBER].
5. Reasons for any post-key changes.
Rs. 10 IPO enclosed.

Yours faithfully,
[Name]
[Address + phone + email]
[Date]

• Day 31 First Appeal.
• Day 76 Second Appeal to CIC.
• Parallel Conducting body's representation cell; CAT (Central Admin Tribunal) for Govt jobs.

• CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011) — Answer-sheets disclosable.
• ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011) — Fiduciary defence narrowed.

• Forgetting Roll No.
• Asking for evaluator identity (§8(1)(g)).

Yes — via CAT/HC. RTI is the foundation.

• Answer-sheet RTI
• Result delay RTI
• File RTI online — 12 steps
• RTI — 25 questions answered

• RTI Act, 2005 — full text.
• Citation chain in body.
• Citizen Charter of the relevant authority.
• Case-law database at /cases/search.

Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.