Land + housing RTI — DDA / PMAY / mutation; §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary

Land + housing RTI — DDA / PMAY / mutation; §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: Land + housing RTI — DDA / PMAY / mutation; §4 1 b xii beneficiary - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference.

Housing + land RTIs combine intense public interest (welfare scheme delivery, large-scale fraud risk) with personal-data sensitivity. The framework: beneficiary lists are mandatorily disclosable under §4(1)(b)(xii); allotment criteria + status disclosure per public-interest accountability; specific allotee personal data balanced under §8(1)(j) + DPDP §44(3).

Statutory framework

RTI Act §4(1)(b)(xii) [beneficiary list mandatory disclosure]; §8(1)(j) [personal info]; PMAY scheme guidelines; DDA Act + Land Acquisition Act.

Key principles

  • Beneficiary list under welfare scheme (PMAY etc.) — mandatorily disclosable under §4(1)(b)(xii).
  • Allotment criteria + scoring methodology — disclosable per accountability.
  • Specific allotee data (phone, address) — case-specific balancing.
  • Land record (Bhulekh / 7-12) — public record, disclosable.
  • Mutation status — disclosable.
  • Personal details of land owner — limited disclosure under §8(1)(j).

Decision framework

  1. Identify the request category — Beneficiary list / allotment / land record / mutation?
  2. For beneficiary lists, apply §4(1)(b)(xii) — Mandatorily disclosable; PIO cannot refuse aggregate list.
  3. For specific allotee data — Balance under §8(1)(j) + DPDP §44(3).
  4. For land records — Public record — disclosable. Bhulekh portals already publish much of this.
  5. Apply §10 severability — Aggregate vs individual identifying detail.
  6. Issue speaking order — Cite §4(1)(b)(xii) for beneficiary lists; CIC orders for allotee data.

Template

To: [Applicant Name]

Subject: Reply to RTI [____] — Land / housing records

Sir/Madam,

Your application sought records related to [specific subject]. The framework applied:

BENEFICIARY LIST (under §4(1)(b)(xii)):
Aggregate beneficiary list under [scheme/program] is mandatorily disclosable. Disclosed: list of all beneficiaries with name + scheme + sanctioned amount.

ALLOTMENT CRITERIA + METHODOLOGY:
Disclosed: complete scoring methodology + waiting list rank methodology.

SPECIFIC ALLOTEE DATA:
For specific allotee personal data (phone, address, family details), balance applied:
- Aggregate disclosure (allotee name + flat no): yes
- Personal contact details: exempt under §8(1)(j)
- Aadhaar / Bank: exempt under §8(1)(j) + DPDP §44(3)

LAND RECORD (BHULEKH / 7-12):
Disclosed — public record. Available also at [state Bhulekh portal] online.

MUTATION STATUS:
Disclosed — public record.

OWNER DETAILS:
Owner name: disclosed (already in public record). Phone / personal contact: exempt under §8(1)(j).

ALLOTEE COMPLAINT / DISPUTE:
Pre-decision investigation: exempt under §8(1)(h). Post-decision: disclosable.

Section 10 severability throughout.

Yours faithfully,
[Name, Designation, PIO]

Illustrations

Complete PMAY beneficiary list for FY 2025-26

Mandatorily disclosable per §4(1)(b)(xii).

Specific allotee's phone + address (DDA flat)

Personal contact: exempt §8(1)(j). Allotment status: disclosed.

Bhulekh entry for survey number 234/B

Public record — disclosed.

Mutation file noting on property transfer

Pre-decision noting: exempt. Post-decision (mutation order): disclosed.

Land acquisition compensation paid to specific landowner

Disclosed — public-money use accountability.

Complaint of fraud in PMAY beneficiary selection

Pre-investigation: exempt §8(1)(h). Post-decision: disclosed.

Case law anchors

  • Bombay HC, Re: PMAY Beneficiary Lists (2018) — §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary disclosure mandatory.
  • Subhash Chandra Agarwal v CPIO (SC 2019) — Public-interest accountability framework.
  • Kerala HC, Re: KSHB Beneficiary Lists (2017) — State housing board beneficiary disclosure.
  • CIC, Re: DDA Allotment cases (2014-2024) — Specific framework for housing authority disclosure.
  • Karnataka HC, Re: Bhulekh Online (2019) — Land records as public records online.

Common mistakes

  • Refusing beneficiary list under §8(1)(j) — violates §4(1)(b)(xii) mandatory disclosure.
  • Disclosing personal contact details (phone, address) — violates §8(1)(j) + DPDP.
  • Failing to apply §10 severability for mixed records.
  • Treating all land records as personal — Bhulekh is public.
  • Refusing post-decision mutation orders — they're public records.
  • Generic refusal of complaint files — apply Bhagat Singh + R.K. Jain.

Pro tips

  • Maintain a “scheme list” — for each housing scheme, prepare standard beneficiary disclosure template.
  • Coordinate with state Bhulekh portal — most land record requests should redirect to portal.
  • For DDA / housing authority, develop standard reply formats by scheme.
  • Train allotment staff on §4(1)(b)(xii) — mandatory disclosure obligation.
  • For complaint-related queries, document inquiry status carefully.
  • For sensitive religious/caste data of beneficiaries (state-supplementary schemes), apply state-specific privacy norms.

FAQs

Can I refuse beneficiary list claiming "personal data"?

No — §4(1)(b)(xii) mandates disclosure. CIC has consistently held aggregate disclosure mandatory.

Allotee's photograph / KYC?

Generally exempt under §8(1)(j). Accountability override only with specific public-interest.

Land owned by a specific person?

Bhulekh / 7-12 entry is public — name disclosable. Personal contact details exempt.

Allotment of LIG/EWS in private builder project?

Aggregate disclosure as per scheme guidelines + §4(1)(b)(xii). Specific allotee details case-specific.

Mutation file noting?

Pre-decision: exempt §8(1)(i). Post-decision (mutation order): disclosed.

Sources

RTI Act §4(1)(b)(xii); CIC housing-related orders 2014-2024; Bhulekh portals + state housing acts.

Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.

📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views