Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | guide:applicant:application:sample:fir [2026/07/03 01:56] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-title=(Sample RTI for FIR Charge Sheet Closure Report India 2026)& | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Sample RTI for FIR, charge-sheet, | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 100%> | ||
| + | **Quick answer.** Police refusing to register your FIR, or denying you a copy of your registered FIR / charge-sheet / closure report? File a free RTI to the **Public Information Officer of the Superintendent of Police (rural) or Commissioner of Police (urban)**. The PIO must reply in **30 days** under **§7(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005** with the file movement, the investigating officer' | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 100%> | ||
| + | **FIR RTI: at a glance** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ ⏰ FIR registration | ||
| + | | **Same day** -- mandatory under Lalita Kumari 2014 | **30 days** -- Section 7(1), RTI Act 2005 | **₹10** -- state authority (BPL = 0) | **SP / CP PIO** -- + Magistrate for §156(3) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Process flow:** ① File complaint at police station → ② If FIR not registered, escalate to SP → ③ If still refused, file §156(3) CrPC complaint to Magistrate → ④ Parallel RTI for status → ⑤ §19(1) First Appeal if RTI delayed | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== What an FIR is: in 50 words ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A **First Information Report (FIR)** is the formal record of a cognizable offence under **§154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973** (now **§173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023** in force from 1 July 2024). The police are bound to register an FIR; non-registration is itself an offence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Legal position in India ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **§154 CrPC 1973 / §173 BNSS 2023**: every cognizable offence MUST be registered as an FIR. Mandatory. **Lalita Kumari v. State of UP** (2014) 2 SCC 1: Constitution Bench: registration is mandatory; preliminary enquiry only in 7 specified categories. | ||
| + | * **§156(3) CrPC / §175(3) BNSS**: if police refuse, the citizen can directly approach the **Magistrate of First Class** with a written complaint. The Magistrate can direct registration + investigation. | ||
| + | * **§173(2) CrPC / §193 BNSS**: charge-sheet must be filed in 60 / 90 days (depending on offence severity). Closure report = " | ||
| + | * **Public-authority status**: every State Police Department is a public authority under **§2(h) of the RTI Act**. State RTI Rules apply. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Why your FIR / charge-sheet is stuck: 8 common reasons ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Police refusing to register**: most common. Cited as " | ||
| + | - **Wrong jurisdiction**: | ||
| + | - **Investigating officer transferred**: | ||
| + | - **Charge-sheet pending forensic / postmortem report**: file in " | ||
| + | - **B-summary / closure being applied for without notice to you**: you have a right to be heard before B-summary is accepted by Magistrate. | ||
| + | - **Complainant copy delayed**: even though FIR is registered, the certified copy is not given to you. | ||
| + | - **High-profile case**: politically sensitive matters get stalled. | ||
| + | - **Bribe expectation**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Real-life case: Sneha' | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round box 80%> | ||
| + | **Sneha Verma, 34, schoolteacher in Lucknow.** Cyber-fraud: | ||
| + | |||
| + | On **18 February 2025** Sneha filed: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **§156(3) complaint** to the **Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow** under §156(3) CrPC + §66/§66C of the IT Act, with all evidence (call recordings, bank statement, phone-tower data). | ||
| + | - **Parallel RTI** to **PIO, Office of Commissioner of Police, Lucknow** for: (a) the precise jurisdiction rule between Cyber Cell and local PS for fraud above ₹50,000, (b) the noting on her application of 4 February. | ||
| + | - **Parallel RTI** to **PIO, State Cyber Cell, UP** for: (a) the SOP for fraud cases above ₹50,000, (b) why her case was bounced back. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Result.** Magistrate' | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Total cost**: ₹124 (two RTIs × ₹62) + ₹500 court fee. **Time to FIR**: 14 days from §156(3) filing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Sneha, March 2025 | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Step-by-step: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Step 1: Locate your complaint.** Date filed, PS name, complaint reference (or just the date if no number was given). | ||
| + | - **Step 2: Identify the right office.** SP (rural districts) / CP (urban / metro). State Cyber Cell for cyber fraud above the local-PS threshold. | ||
| + | - **Step 3: Draft the RTI.** Use the [[# | ||
| + | - **Step 4: File parallel §156(3) complaint** if FIR not registered. This is NOT an RTI: it is a CrPC / BNSS complaint to the Magistrate. RTI runs in parallel. | ||
| + | - **Step 5: Wait 30 days for RTI.** Use the reply at the §156(3) hearing. | ||
| + | - **Step 6: Escalate.** §19(1) First Appeal in 30 days for the RTI side. Magistrate' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sample RTI letter: copy and adapt ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | To, | ||
| + | The Public Information Officer, | ||
| + | Office of the Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police, | ||
| + | [District / City], [State] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 - | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | Date: [DD Month YYYY] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sir / Madam, | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. I, [Your full name], a citizen of India residing at [address], am filing | ||
| + | this application under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 seeking the | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | FIR / DD number | ||
| + | | ||
| + | Closure report / B-summary objection] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Information sought: | ||
| + | |||
| + | (a) Current status of my complaint as on date of reply, with date of last | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | (b) Certified copy of the FIR (if registered) under §154 CrPC / §173 BNSS. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (c) If FIR is not registered, the certified copy of the noting recording | ||
| + | the reason for non-registration, | ||
| + | |||
| + | (d) Name + designation of the Investigating Officer (IO) and the | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | (e) Charge-sheet status (if filed): date, court, copy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (f) Closure report status (if filed): date, type (B-summary / C-summary), | ||
| + | and the procedure for my objection / Naraz petition. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (g) The state SOP / Police Circular governing the jurisdiction of this PS | ||
| + | vs Cyber Cell / Special Cell / SIT for the offence type. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (h) Grievance Register entries pertaining to FIR-registration matters in | ||
| + | this PS during the period 1 January 2024 onwards. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (i) Name and contact of the FAA for this office. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Fee: Rs 10 IPO in favour of " | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Lalita Kumari ground: I respectfully invoke the Constitution Bench in | ||
| + | | ||
| + | held that registration of an FIR is mandatory under §154 CrPC and that | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. Severance + transfer per §10 + §6(3); reply within 30 days per §7(1). | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Signature, name, address, phone, email, date.] | ||
| + | Encl.: Rs 10 IPO + photocopy of complaint + acknowledgement. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP info> | ||
| + | **For non-registration of FIR**, file a parallel **§156(3) CrPC / §175(3) BNSS complaint** to the **Chief Judicial Magistrate** of your district. Take the RTI reply (when it comes) to the §156(3) hearing. Use [[https:// | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common mistakes ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Asking police why they didn't register FIR**: RTI gives the noting, not the reason. Reframe as "the noting + circular cited" | ||
| + | * **Filing only RTI without §156(3)**: RTI gets information; | ||
| + | * **Wrong jurisdiction**: | ||
| + | * **No fee**: non-acceptance memo. Always include IPO. | ||
| + | * **Asking for IO's call recordings**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== After you file your RTI: timeline ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ Day ^ RTI side ^ §156(3) side ^ | ||
| + | | Day 0 | RTI submitted | ||
| + | | Day 1-29 | PIO has 30 days | Magistrate may issue notice / direct enquiry | ||
| + | | Day 30 | Mandatory reply | Hearing scheduled (typical 7-21 days) | | ||
| + | | Day 31+ | §19(1) First Appeal if delayed | ||
| + | | Day 91+ | §19(3) Second Appeal | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Police refused to register my FIR. RTI or §156(3)? ==== | ||
| + | **Both, parallel.** RTI gets you the file noting + the SOP; §156(3) gets you the FIR registered. Each by itself is incomplete. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I get the FIR copy without going to the police station? ==== | ||
| + | **Yes.** RTI for " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== I want to challenge a B-summary closure. RTI sample? ==== | ||
| + | File RTI for: (a) date of closure report, (b) certified copy of the closure report + final form, (c) the noting recording the IO's findings. Then file a **Naraz petition / objection** with the Magistrate within 30 days of B-summary acceptance notice. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can I get the IO's mobile number / personal details? ==== | ||
| + | **Personal details** of the IO are exempt under **§8(1)(j)** post-DPDP. But **name + designation + posting** is public information; | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== I want the charge-sheet copy. RTI to which office? ==== | ||
| + | **Court**: once charge-sheet is filed, it becomes a court document. Apply for certified copy at the **Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate / Sessions Court** where charge-sheet was filed. Court fee + ₹10 per page. RTI to police is for the police-side file (IO noting), not the charge-sheet itself. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can a foreign national file an RTI for FIR? ==== | ||
| + | **No.** RTI is for Indian citizens. A foreign national who is the victim can pursue the FIR through their consular post in India + the local police directly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== I'm a journalist. Can I get FIR copies of multiple cases? ==== | ||
| + | **Yes.** Journalists routinely file RTI for FIR copies. Cite **CPIO SC v. Subhash Agarwal** (2020) 5 SCC 481 if §8(1)(j) is invoked: public-interest balance favours press scrutiny. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if police claim " | ||
| + | Cite **Bhagat Singh v. CIC** (Delhi HC, 2007): §8(1)(h) is not a blanket shield; the PIO must show actual harm to the investigation. Also cite **Adesh Kumar v. UoI**: the PIO cannot refuse without specifying which limb of §8(1)(h) applies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is there a fee for FIR copy directly from the police station? ==== | ||
| + | Most states: **Free** for the complainant under the **Right to Service Act** of the state. Some states charge ₹2-5 per copy. RTI route is parallel and uniform: ₹10. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== My FIR is in Hindi but I want it in English. Can RTI get me a translation? | ||
| + | RTI can ask for the **English version of the FIR if it exists on file**. If not, you must translate yourself or via a paid translator. Court-certified translations are required for High Court / Supreme Court matters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Police officer asked for a bribe to register FIR. What now? ==== | ||
| + | File: (1) RTI for the SHO's noting + jurisdictional circulars, (2) **§156(3) complaint** to Magistrate, (3) **Anti-Corruption Bureau / State Vigilance** complaint with the RTI reply attached. The combination almost always produces a result. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What about cyber fraud? Same RTI? ==== | ||
| + | **Yes**, but address it to **PIO, State Cyber Cell** + **PIO, Office of CP / SP**. Refer to the state' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Companion citizen guides on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related case law ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Lalita Kumari v. State of UP** (2014) 2 SCC 1: Constitution Bench: FIR registration mandatory. | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Tools you can use ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * 🪄 [[https:// | ||
| + | * 🎤 [[https:// | ||
| + | * ⚖ [[https:// | ||
| + | * 📅 [[https:// | ||
| + | * 🚨 [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citations and sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Right to Information Act, 2005**: §6, §7, §8, §10, §19. [[:act|Full text]]. | ||
| + | * **Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973**: §154, §156(3), §173 (now superseded by BNSS 2023 in respective sections from 1 July 2024). | ||
| + | * **Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023**: §173, §175(3), §193. | ||
| + | * **Lalita Kumari v. State of UP** (2014) 2 SCC 1: Constitution Bench, FIR-registration mandate. | ||
| + | * **Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023** + **Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023**: companion BNS / BSA. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 4 May 2026 by RTI Wiki editorial team. Real-life case (Sneha, Lucknow) used with consent. CrPC + BNSS sections verified against IndiaCode.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||