Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(exam revaluation rti, rechecking exam, mark dispute rti, cbse revaluation, university revaluation, fail mark rti)
+metatag-description=(Exam revaluation / rechecking is delayed or denied. RTI to evaluator for marks-record, evaluator notes. Aditya Bandopadhyay route + template (2026).)
+metatag-title=(Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026))}}
+====== Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026) ======
+{{ :social:auto:exam-revaluation-rti.png?direct&1200 |Exam Revaluation RTI — revaluation, rechecking, marks (2026)}}
+{{page>snippets:dpdp-banner}}
+<WRAP info>
+After CBSE v.
+</WRAP>
+===== Why this RTI works =====
+After CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011), evaluated answer-sheets are 'information' under §2(f). The candidate can demand the answer-sheet, mark-book extract and evaluator notes via RTI. Most boards moved to a formal reval/recheck/photocopy regime, but RTI remains the safety net for unjustified denials.
+===== Legal framework =====
+  * **RTI Act, 2005** §6, §7(1), §2(f).
+  * **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011)** — evaluated answer-sheet is 'information'; disclosure to candidate is mandatory.
+  * **ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011)** — fiduciary defence does not apply to candidate's own record.
+  * **Conducting body's own bye-laws on revaluation**.
+===== RTI template — copy & file =====
+<code>
+To:
+The Public Information Officer (PIO),
+[Office name + address].
+Subject: RTI under §6 — Exam Revaluation query
+Sir/Madam,
+Under the RTI Act, 2005 read with CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011), kindly provide:
+. Photocopy of evaluated answer-sheet, [EXAM], Roll No. [NUMBER], [SUBJECT].
+. Mark-book / award-list extract showing my marks question-wise.
+. Status of revaluation request dated [DATE], application no. [NUMBER].
+. Comparison of total marks before and after revaluation.
+. Written reasons if revaluation has not changed marks.
+Rs. 10 IPO enclosed.
+Yours faithfully,
+[Name]
+[Address + phone + email]
+[Date]
+</code>
+===== Escalation timeline =====
+  * **Day 31** — First Appeal to FAA.
+  * **Day 76** — Second Appeal to CIC / SIC.
+  * **Parallel** — Conducting body's revaluation grievance cell.
+===== Case law anchors =====
+  * **CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (SC, 2011)** — Foundational — answer-sheets disclosable to candidate.
+  * **ICAI v. Shaunak Satya (SC, 2011)** — Examining body's fiduciary defence narrowed to third parties.
+  * **Kendriya Vidyalaya v. CIC (Delhi HC, 2013)** — Internal evaluation records disclosable.
+===== Common mistakes =====
+  * Asking for the evaluator's identity — protected under §8(1)(g).
+  * Asking before the bye-law revaluation window opens.
+  * Forgetting to enclose original revaluation receipt.
+===== Frequently asked questions =====
+==== Can I ask for evaluator's name? ====
+No — §8(1)(g) protects evaluator identity. You can ask for the marks-record + answer-sheet copy.
+==== Cost of answer-sheet copy? ====
+Boards charge Rs. 700-1500 for photocopy under their own bye-laws. RTI fee is separate Rs. 10.
+===== Related reading =====
+  * [[:exam-result-delay-rti|Exam result delay RTI]]
+  * [[:exam-answer-sheet-rti|Answer-sheet RTI]]
+  * [[:file-rti-online-india|File RTI online — 12 steps]]
+  * [[:faq|RTI — 25 questions answered]]
+===== Sources =====
+  * RTI Act, 2005 — full text.
+  * Citation chain in body.
+  * Citizen Charter of the relevant authority.
+  * Case-law database at [[:cases:search|/cases/search]].
+//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti revaluation exam education tier-2 2026}}

Was this helpful? — views