ecourts:video-conferencing-court
Translate:

Court video conferencing (VC) — process + RTI (2026 guide)

Quick answer: Video Conferencing (VC) at court allows remote appearance for hearings, evidence, witness examination. Approved by SC in *Salem Advocate Bar v UoI* (2005) + COVID-era rules (2020).

Key facts

  • VC approved for hearings, evidence, witness examination
  • SC + HC + District + Subordinate courts
  • VC rooms in district courts, prisons, hospitals (vulnerable witnesses)
  • Court certifies VC equipment + bandwidth
  • Application via court counter or e-Filing
  • RTI for VC equipment + slot availability

Step-by-step

  1. Apply at court counter — Form mentioning VC need + reason.
  2. Court approves VC slot — Date + time + venue.
  3. Advocate + party at VC venue — On scheduled date.
  4. Hearing conducted via VC — Court records + judge sees both ends.
  5. Order signed at court — VC equivalent to physical hearing.
  6. RTI for VC schedule + complaints — Court PIO.

Common issues

  • VC slot denied — court discretion; RTI for criteria.
  • Equipment failure — adjournment; court reschedules.
  • Bandwidth issues — RTI for infrastructure status.
  • Witness rejection on VC — rare; court justifies.

If stuck — file an RTI

Court records are split: judicial records (case file, orders) follow CPC rules + court counter; administrative records (vacancy, infrastructure, listing logic, judges' assets) are disclosable via RTI to the court PIO.

1. Status of my case no. _____ as on date.
2. Reasons for delay / non-listing in past 30 days.
3. Number of similar cases pending + disposed in past 12 months.
4. Procedure to seek certified copy / file inspection.
5. Name + designation of court PIO + appellate authority.

Auto-fill the PIO + your case: Open the AI RTI Drafter →

Frequently asked questions

Free?

Yes — court facility. Witness travel reimbursed if at remote VC venue.

Witness examination via VC valid?

Yes per *Salem Advocate Bar* (SC 2005) + amendments to CrPC.

Can opposing party object?

Yes — court decides on objection.

VC denial — appeal?

Higher court via writ petition.

Summary + next step

Bottom line: Video Conferencing (VC) at court allows remote appearance for hearings, evidence, witness examination. Approved by SC in *Salem Advocate Bar v UoI* (2005) + COVID-era rules (2020).

Share this article
Was this helpful? views
ecourts/video-conferencing-court.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: GNU Free Documentation License 1.3
GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki