Module 02 — Drafting RTIs that survive PIO refusal

RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course Module 02

Quick Reply: RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 02: Drafting RTIs that survive PIO refusal. Write applications a PIO cant legally refuse.

Goal: Write applications a PIO can't legally refuse.

Frame for disclosability

  1. Ask for records that exist: invoices, orders, file notings (post-decision), minutes, lists.
  2. Avoid asking why decisions were taken — ask for reasons recorded in the file.
  3. Avoid named third-party data unless the public-interest case is iron-clad (§8(1)(j) vs §8(2)).
  4. For §8(1)(d) commercial-confidence: ask for post-award records — they're disclosable per consistent HC rulings.

5 patterns that always work

  1. “Year-wise” — “Year-wise expenditure on X for FY 2020-21 to FY 2025-26” — easier for PIO to retrieve, harder to refuse.
  2. “List of” — “List of contractors awarded works above ₹50L in FY 2024-25” — pure record disclosure.
  3. “Copies of” — “Copies of all letters sent by X office to Y office between [dates]” — discrete files, easy to sever.
  4. “Statistics on” — “Number of complaints received and resolved on issue X in FY 2024-25” — aggregate data, no privacy issue.
  5. “Reasons recorded for” — “Reasons recorded in the file for [decision X]” — specific, file-bound.

Anticipate §8 objections

For each sub-question, write a 1-line counter-argument in the application itself, citing case law:

  1. Anticipate §8(1)(d): “The information sought is post-decisional and the tender process is concluded; §8(1)(d) does not apply per Bombay HC in [case].
  2. Anticipate §8(1)(e): “The records are held in the course of statutory duty, not in fiduciary capacity; §8(1)(e) does not apply per SC in Union of India v. Patel (March 2026).
  3. Anticipate §8(1)(j): “The information is about public activity of public servants; §8(1)(j) does not apply per Karnataka HC 9-Feb-2026.

This pre-empts the standard refusal — PIOs hate having their boilerplate exemption-claim already torn apart in the application.

Word-budget the application

PIOs glaze over after 2 pages. Keep applications tight:

  1. Header (5 lines)
  2. 1-line intro
  3. 4-7 numbered sub-questions, each 1-2 lines
  4. Fee declaration (1 line)
  5. Footer (signature + ID + phone)

A 1-page application gets answered. A 5-page application gets returned for 'simplification' under §7(9).

When in doubt, file two

Two narrow, focused RTIs > one broad. PIOs can §7(9) reject “voluminous” — but cannot reject “specific”. Split a tender RTI into:

  1. RTI A: technical bid document + evaluation matrix
  2. RTI B: financial bid documents + comparative chart

✅ Quiz

Quiz available from your course dashboard.

Next

📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views