Youth Bar Association v. Union of India
Youth Bar Association v. Union of India (Supreme Court of India, 2016-09-07) (2016) 9 SCC 473 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 154-CrPC, 4. FIRs to be uploaded on state police websites within 24-72 hours. Every State must upload First Information Reports (FIRs) on the State Police website within 24 hours (urban) to 72 hours (rural).
Holding
FIRs to be uploaded on state police websites within 24-72 hours.
Ratio
Every State must upload First Information Reports (FIRs) on the State Police website within 24 hours (urban) to 72 hours (rural). Exceptions: sexual offences, POCSO, sedition, terrorism, official secrets.
Section(s) applied
- Section 154-CrPC
- Section 4
Practitioner takeaway
Public upload of FIRs mandated; sensitive categories excepted.
Citation
- Citation: (2016) 9 SCC 473
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Date: 2016-09-07
- Outcome: allowed
- Reporter / Cause-list: (2016) 9 SCC 473
Why this case matters for citizens
This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.
Citizen action steps if your own RTI is being refused on similar grounds
- Day 30 — silence by PIO = deemed refusal under §7(2). File §19(1) First Appeal in 30 days using First Appeal Builder.
- Day 60-90 — if FAA also refuses, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
- Beyond 18 months pending — writ petition under Article 226 to the High Court.
- Parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
Citing this ruling in your appeal
Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.
Related landmark RTI rulings
- CPIO Supreme Court v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (Constitution Bench) — office of CJI is public authority
- Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI — IC vacancies + transparency
- Girish Deshpande — §8(1)(j) personal information test
- Bhagat Singh v. CIC — procedural compliance
- Adesh Kumar v. UoI — irrelevance is not a ground