§7(3) additional-fee intimation must be WRITTEN and cite right-to-review; stops 30-day clock.

§7(3) fee intimation stops the 30-day clock; PIO must issue written intimation with right-to-review before charging.

§7(3) requires the PIO to provide written intimation of additional fee payable before providing information beyond the application fee. The intimation must include: (a) the calculation details, (b) the applicant's right to seek review of the calculation, © that the 30-day clock stops until fee is paid. Oral/phone intimation does not satisfy §7(3).

§7(3), fee intimation, SC, 30-day clock

These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.

• RTI fee for BPL applicants — Calcutta HC (HC-CAL 2017)
• Multiple-topic RTI applications — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2021)
• Applicant's right to be heard at FAA / Commission — Madras HC (HC-MAD 2020)
• Inspection charges — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2014)
• K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (SC 2017)

• All Supreme Court of India rulings in the corpus
• All RTI cases turning on §7
• All landmark rulings
• Full case-law search
• Case-Law Database — overview
• PIO RTI Reply Guide
• The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.