Table of Contents
§23 civil-courts bar — SC clarification
Supreme Court of India · 2017-01-01 · Citation awaited · ★ Landmark
§23 bars civil-court jurisdiction; writ remedy under Articles 226/32 remains available.
Case details
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2017-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Various |
| Respondent | Various |
| RTI Act sections | §23 |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
Outcome
§23 bars civil-court jurisdiction in RTI matters; writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/32 remains.
Ratio decidendi
§23 of the RTI Act bars civil courts from entertaining suits in respect of orders made under the Act. However, writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 (HC) and 32 (SC) is constitutional and cannot be ousted — challenges to Commission orders proceed through writ, not civil suit.
Keywords
§23, civil court bar, writ, Article 226
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Civil works contract records — Tripura HC (HC-TR 2022)
- PM CARES Fund status — CIC (CIC 2022)
- Defying Commission order — Madras HC (HC-MAD 2020)
- Gujarat HC pleadings — third-party RTI not maintainable (HC-GUJ 2019)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion