no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Judicial pendency data under RTI — Supreme Court 2024,Supreme Court of India RTI,RTI §2,RTI §4,RTI §8,pendency,section 4(1)(b),section 8(1)(b),proactive disclosure,judicial data)&metatag-description=(Court-wise pendency data is disclosable under §4[1][b] proactive disclosure; individual judicial notings remain exempt under §8[1][b].)}}
+====== Judicial pendency data under RTI — Supreme Court 2024 ======
+<WRAP center round info 95%>
+**Supreme Court of India** · 2024-05-10 · (2024) 5 SCC 512 · **★ Landmark**
+</WRAP>
+**Court-wise pendency data is disclosable under §4[1][b] proactive disclosure; individual judicial notings remain exempt under §8[1][b].**
+//Aggregate pendency is public; judicial deliberation is not.//
+===== Case details =====
+^ Court | Supreme Court of India |
+^ Decided | 2024-05-10 |
+^ Citation | (2024) 5 SCC 512 |
+^ Bench | C, h, a, n, d, r, a, c, h, u, d,  , C, J, ,,  , J, ., B, .,  , P, a, r, d, i, w, a, l, a, ,,  , M, a, n, o, j,  , M, i, s, r, a,  , J, J |
+^ Petitioner | In Re: Judicial Transparency (SC, 2024) |
+^ Respondent |  |
+^ RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b), §8(1)(b) |
+^ Outcome | partly allowed |
+===== Outcome =====
+Court-wise pendency data is disclosable under §4(1)(b) proactive disclosure; individual judicial notings remain exempt under §8(1)(b).
+===== Ratio decidendi =====
+Aggregate docket-level pendency data (by court, by age-band, by subject) falls squarely within the §4(1)(b)(xii) duty of proactive disclosure. It does not attract §8(1)(b) because it is not the internal deliberative work of a judge. Case-specific notings by a judge remain within §8(1)(b).
+===== Keywords =====
+pendency, section 4(1)(b), section 8(1)(b), proactive disclosure, judicial data
+===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
+//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
+  * [[/cases/sc-rti-judicial-delay-information-2023|Judicial-delay records — SC]] (SC 2023)
+  * [[/cases/khanapuram-gandaiah-2010-sc|Khanapuram Gandaiah v. Administrative Officer]] (SC 2010)
+  * [[/cases/cic-rti-subordinate-court-judge-transfer-2018|Subordinate-court judge transfers — CIC]] (CIC 2018)
+  * [[/cases/cic-judicial-academies-2020|Judicial Academies under RTI — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
+  * [[/cases/namit-sharma-v-uoi-2012-sc|Namit Sharma v. Union of India]] (SC 2012)
+===== Related =====
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=SC|All Supreme Court of India rulings in the corpus]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=4|All RTI cases turning on §4]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
+  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?landmark=1|All landmark rulings]]
+  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
+  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
+  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
+  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
+  * [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/placeholder-sc-pendency-2024/|External reported text →]]
+<WRAP center round alert 95%>
+**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
+</WRAP>
+//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
+{{tag>case-law court-sc section-2 section-4 section-8 landmark}}