Machine-readable electoral rolls — SC

Machine-readable electoral rolls — SC — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: Electoral rolls disclosable in book form; machine-readable format denied on privacy-scale grounds. Electoral rolls: book/PDF disclosure OK; machine-readable bulk. </WRAP>

Supreme Court of India · 2023-01-01 · Citation awaited

Electoral rolls: book/PDF disclosure OK; machine-readable bulk format restricted due to aggregation risk. ===== Case details ===== ^ Court | Supreme Court of India | ^ Decided | 2023-01-01 | ^ Citation | Citation awaited | ^ Petitioner | RTI applicant / civic-tech organisation | ^ Respondent | Election Commission | ^ RTI Act sections | §4(1)(b) | ^ Outcome | Partly allowed | ===== Outcome ===== Electoral rolls disclosable in book form; machine-readable format denied on privacy-scale grounds. ===== Ratio decidendi ===== Electoral rolls are public records and disclosable in the polling-booth-wise book form / PDF. Bulk machine-readable formats (CSV / database dumps) are restricted due to the aggregation/profiling risks — a proportionality concern rooted in Puttaswamy. ===== Keywords ===== electoral rolls, machine readable, privacy, aggregation ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law. * Electoral roll copies — CIC (CIC 2016) * ADR v. Union of India (Electoral Bonds) (SC 2024) * Post-ADR Electoral Bonds — RTI sequel (CIC 2024) * MGNREGS beneficiary lists — Kerala HC (HC-KER 2020) * K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (SC 2017) ===== Related ===== * All Supreme Court of India rulings in the corpus * All RTI cases turning on §4 * All RTI cases turning on §8 * Full case-law search * Case-Law Database — overview * PIO RTI Reply Guide * The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated

Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.

Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳

Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.

Donate Now
📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views
Article created: 1 July 2026, 21:56 ISTLast updated: 22 July 2026, 23:14 ISTWritten by Editors of righttoinformation.wiki