Pension sanction delay — Madras HC

Pension sanction delay — Madras HC — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: Delayed pension sanction + non-disclosure of file status attracts both §19[8][a] compliance direction and §20 penalty exposure.

High Court of Madras · 2022-01-01 · Citation awaited

Pension sanction delay: FAA may direct release + cite PIO §20 exposure; structural remedy under §19(8)(a).

Case details

Court High Court of Madras
Decided 2022-01-01
Citation Citation awaited
Petitioner Retired officer
Respondent Accountant General
RTI Act sections §7, §19, §20
Outcome Applicant allowed

Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳

Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.

Donate Now

Outcome

Delayed pension sanction + non-disclosure of file status attracts both §19(8)(a) compliance direction and §20 penalty exposure.

Ratio decidendi

Where a pension sanction is stalled and the PIO refuses to disclose file status, the FAA (and later the SIC) may direct immediate processing under §19(8)(a) structural remedy. The PIO's non-disclosure may attract §20(1) penalty. Such combined orders are routine in Madras HC pension-delay cases.

Keywords

pension, Madras HC, §19(8)(a), §20

Similar cases in the corpus

These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.

Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.

📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views