Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP
Quick Reply: FIR registration mandatory upon information of cognisable offence. Case: Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench), 2013-11-12) (2014) 2 SCC 1 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 154-CrPC. FIR registration mandatory upon information of cognisable offence. Registration of FIR under §154(1) of CrPC is mandatory when information disclosing a cognisable offence is received.
Holding
FIR registration mandatory upon information of cognisable offence.
Ratio
Registration of FIR under §154(1) of CrPC is mandatory when information disclosing a cognisable offence is received. Preliminary inquiry is permitted only in 7 narrow categories — matrimonial, commercial, medical-negligence, corruption, abnormal-delay reporting, suspect information, jurisdiction-verification — and must conclude within 7 days.
Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳
Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.
Section(s) applied
- Section 154-CrPC
Practitioner takeaway
§154(1) CrPC; preliminary inquiry only in 7 narrow categories.
Citation
- Citation: (2014) 2 SCC 1
- Court: Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench)
- Date: 2013-11-12
- Outcome: disposed
- Reporter / Cause-list: (2014) 2 SCC 1
Related
Reader signal
Was this article useful?
Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.
