Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP

Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: FIR registration mandatory upon information of cognisable offence. Case: Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.

Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench), 2013-11-12) (2014) 2 SCC 1 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 154-CrPC. FIR registration mandatory upon information of cognisable offence. Registration of FIR under §154(1) of CrPC is mandatory when information disclosing a cognisable offence is received.

Holding

FIR registration mandatory upon information of cognisable offence.

Ratio

Registration of FIR under §154(1) of CrPC is mandatory when information disclosing a cognisable offence is received. Preliminary inquiry is permitted only in 7 narrow categories — matrimonial, commercial, medical-negligence, corruption, abnormal-delay reporting, suspect information, jurisdiction-verification — and must conclude within 7 days.

Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳

Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.

Donate Now

Section(s) applied

  • Section 154-CrPC

Practitioner takeaway

§154(1) CrPC; preliminary inquiry only in 7 narrow categories.

Citation

  • Citation: (2014) 2 SCC 1
  • Court: Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench)
  • Date: 2013-11-12
  • Outcome: disposed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: (2014) 2 SCC 1
📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views