Right to Information Wiki
Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi

Delhi Police directed to disclose specific PVR file noting. Case: Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.

Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi

Khalid v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi (Central Information Commission, 2017-06-14) CIC/SA/A/2017/000456 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8(1)(g), 10. Delhi Police directed to disclose specific PVR file noting. Delhi Police directed to disclose the police-verification file noting in respect of a passport application.

Holding

Delhi Police directed to disclose specific PVR file noting.

Ratio

Delhi Police directed to disclose the police-verification file noting in respect of a passport application. The §8(1)(g) defence is not available against the applicant's own record. Severability under §10 applied.

Section(s) applied

  • Section 8(1)(g)
  • Section 10

Practitioner takeaway

§8(1)(g) defence rejected; severability applied.

Citation

  • Citation: CIC/SA/A/2017/000456
  • Court: Central Information Commission
  • Date: 2017-06-14
  • Outcome: allowed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: CIC/SA/A/2017/000456

Why this case matters for citizens

This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.

Citizen action steps if your own RTI is being refused on similar grounds

  1. Day 30 — silence by PIO = deemed refusal under §7(2). File §19(1) First Appeal in 30 days using First Appeal Builder.
  2. Day 60-90 — if FAA also refuses, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
  3. Beyond 18 months pending — writ petition under Article 226 to the High Court.
  4. Parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.

Citing this ruling in your appeal

Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.