Right to Information Wiki
UPSC interview evaluation — Delhi HC 2024

UPSC interview marks of the applicant are disclosable; panel-member-wise scoring is §8[1][e] fiduciary. Own total marks are accessible; interview-board internal.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:hc-delhi-rti-upsc-interview-2024 [2026/05/03 08:32] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(UPSC interview evaluation — Delhi HC 2024,Delhi High Court RTI,RTI §8,UPSC,interview,section 8(1)(e),fiduciary,Aditya Bandopadhyay)&metatag-description=(UPSC interview marks of the applicant are disclosable; panel-member-wise scoring is §8[1][e] fiduciary. Own total marks are accessible; interview-board internal.)}}
 +
 +====== UPSC interview evaluation — Delhi HC 2024 ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Delhi High Court** · 2024-06-20 · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3876
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +**UPSC interview marks of the applicant are disclosable; panel-member-wise scoring is §8[1][e] fiduciary. Own total marks are accessible; interview-board internal.**
 +
 +//Own total marks are accessible; interview-board internal scoring is not.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Delhi High Court |
 +^ Decided | 2024-06-20 |
 +^ Citation | 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3876 |
 +^ Bench | N, a, v, i, n,  , C, h, a, w, l, a,  , J |
 +^ Petitioner | Neha Verma |
 +^ Respondent | UPSC |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(e) |
 +^ Outcome | partly allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +UPSC interview marks of the applicant are disclosable; panel-member-wise scoring is §8(1)(e) fiduciary.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +An aspirant's own total marks in the UPSC personality test are disclosable following //Aditya Bandopadhyay//. Panel-member-wise scoring breakdown attracts §8(1)(e) as it reveals the fiduciary internal deliberation of the Commission. Aggregate total suffices for the candidate's purpose.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +UPSC, interview, section 8(1)(e), fiduciary, Aditya Bandopadhyay
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/bihar-psc-v-state-of-bihar-2012-sc|Bihar PSC — interview marks disclosability]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/bihar-public-service-commission-v-saiyed-hussain-abbas-rizwi-2012-sc|Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-recruitment-panels-anonymity-2014|Recruitment panel anonymity — CIC line]] (CIC 2014)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-calcutta-rti-teacher-recruitment-2022|School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC]] (HC-CAL 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/upsc-v-angesh-kumar-2018-sc|UPSC v. Angesh Kumar]] (SC 2018)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=HC-DEL|All Delhi High Court rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +  * [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/placeholder-hc-del-upsc-2024/|External reported text →]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-hc-del section-8}}