Right to Information Wiki
CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

CJI Office is a public authority; §81j requires balancing under §82. Case: CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal. RTI Wiki citizen guide.

CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench), 2019-11-13) (2019) SCC OnLine SC 1459 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 2(h), 8(1)(j), 8(2). CJI Office is a public authority; §8(1)(j) requires balancing under §8(2). The Office of the Chief Justice of India is a public authority under §2(h).

Holding

CJI Office is a public authority; §8(1)(j) requires balancing under §8(2).

Ratio

The Office of the Chief Justice of India is a public authority under §2(h). Judges' asset declarations and collegium correspondence are subject to §8(1)(j) balancing under §8(2). The IC must conduct the balancing as a judicial exercise.

Section(s) applied

  • Section 2(h)
  • Section 8(1)(j)
  • Section 8(2)

Practitioner takeaway

CJI Office under §2(h); judicial balancing under §8(2) is mandatory.

Citation

  • Citation: (2019) SCC OnLine SC 1459
  • Court: Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench)
  • Date: 2019-11-13
  • Outcome: partly allowed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: (2019) SCC OnLine SC 1459