Right to Information Wiki
Recruitment qualification-dispute records — CIC

Own qualification-dispute / representation file fully disclosable; marks of comparably-placed candidates also permitted for fair challenge.

no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:cic-rti-recruitment-qualification-dispute-2019 [2026/04/23 00:47] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Recruitment qualification-dispute records — CIC,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §7,RTI §8,recruitment,qualification,CIC,challenge)&metatag-description=(Own qualification-dispute / representation file fully disclosable; marks of comparably-placed candidates also permitted for fair challenge.)}}
 +
 +====== Recruitment qualification-dispute records — CIC ======
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 95%>
 +**Central Information Commission** · 2019-01-01 · Citation awaited
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +//Own qualification-dispute file: full access; rank-bracket-peers' marks also disclosable for fair challenge.//
 +
 +===== Case details =====
 +
 +^ Court | Central Information Commission |
 +^ Decided | 2019-01-01 |
 +^ Citation | Citation awaited |
 +^ Petitioner | Unsuccessful candidate |
 +^ Respondent | Recruitment authority |
 +^ RTI Act sections | §7, §8 |
 +^ Outcome | Applicant allowed |
 +
 +===== Outcome =====
 +
 +Own qualification-dispute / representation file fully disclosable; marks of comparably-placed candidates also permitted for fair challenge.
 +
 +===== Ratio decidendi =====
 +
 +Where a candidate is disqualified and raises a representation, they are entitled to the full file — their marks, evaluation rationale, and the representation-response. Marks of candidates at the same rank-bracket may also be provided (anonymised where required) to enable a fair challenge.
 +
 +===== Keywords =====
 +
 +recruitment, qualification, CIC, challenge
 +
 +===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
 +
 +//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
 +
 +  * [[/cases/sic-up-rti-basic-shiksha-2021|UP Basic Shiksha recruitment dispute records — UP SIC]] (SIC-UP 2021)
 +  * [[/cases/bihar-psc-v-state-of-bihar-2012-sc|Bihar PSC — interview marks disclosability]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/bihar-public-service-commission-v-saiyed-hussain-abbas-rizwi-2012-sc|Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi]] (SC 2012)
 +  * [[/cases/hc-calcutta-rti-teacher-recruitment-2022|School Service Commission records — Calcutta HC]] (HC-CAL 2022)
 +  * [[/cases/cic-recruitment-panels-anonymity-2014|Recruitment panel anonymity — CIC line]] (CIC 2014)
 +
 +===== Related =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
 +  * [[:cases:search|Full case-law search]]
 +  * [[:cases|Case-Law Database — overview]]
 +  * [[:pio-rti-reply-guide|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
 +  * [[:act|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
 +
 +<WRAP center round alert 95%>
 +**Editorial summary, not a certified report.** The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, **verify against the full reported decision**. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
 +
 +{{tag>case-law court-cic section-7 section-8}}