Table of Contents
PIB accreditation records — CIC
Central Information Commission · 2019-01-01 · Citation awaited
Own PIB file: full access. Accreditation list (aggregate): §4. Third-party applications: §8(1)(j).
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2019-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Journalist / RTI applicant |
| Respondent | Press Information Bureau |
| RTI Act sections | §7, §8 |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
Outcome
Own PIB accreditation file disclosable; aggregate accredited-journalist list by organisation disclosable; individual applications §8(1)(j).
Ratio decidendi
A journalist's own Press Information Bureau accreditation file — application, references, background-verification outcome — is fully accessible. The aggregate list of accredited journalists by organisation and accreditation category is §4(1)(b) material. Third-party individual applications remain §8(1)(j) protected.
Keywords
PIB, accreditation, journalism, CIC
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- NRC process records — Gauhati HC (HC-GAU 2021)
- Passport Seva records — CIC (CIC 2021)
- NRC aggregate statistics — Gauhati HC (HC-GAU 2022)
- Property-tax assessment records — CIC (CIC 2020)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Discussion