CBI closure reports — CIC — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

CBI closure reports — CIC — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: CBI §24 exempt; closure reports [where corruption/human-rights invoked via proviso] disclosable with CIC approval. CBI §24 exempt, but §24 proviso opens. </WRAP>

Central Information Commission · 2020-01-01 · Citation awaited

CBI §24 exempt, but §24 proviso opens corruption/human-rights investigation closure reports via CIC approval. ===== Case details ===== ^ Court | Central Information Commission | ^ Decided | 2020-01-01 | ^ Citation | Citation awaited | ^ Petitioner | Complainant / RTI applicant | ^ Respondent | CBI | ^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(h), §24 | ^ Outcome | Partly allowed | ===== Outcome ===== CBI §24 exempt; closure reports (where corruption/human-rights invoked via proviso) disclosable with CIC approval. ===== Ratio decidendi ===== CBI is a §24-notified exempt organisation. The §24 proviso — allegations of corruption and human-rights violations — opens a narrow disclosure path. Closure reports in such matters are disclosable with CIC's case-by-case approval; operational details remain protected under §8(1)(h). ===== Keywords ===== CBI, §24 proviso, corruption, closure report ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law. * CBI exemption under §24 — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2013) * §24 proviso — corruption complaint — Bombay HC (HC-BOM 2018) * Police public-relation / RTI-application data — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2021) * Mass-surveillance policy transparency — Delhi HC (HC-DEL 2022) * Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC (SIC-KA 2021) ===== Related ===== * All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus * All RTI cases turning on §8 * All RTI cases turning on §24 * Full case-law search * Case-Law Database — overview * PIO RTI Reply Guide * The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated

Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.

Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.

Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳

Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.

Donate Now
📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Reader signal

Was this article useful?

Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.

- views
Article created: 1 July 2026, 21:56 ISTLast updated: 22 July 2026, 23:14 ISTWritten by Editors of righttoinformation.wiki