Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021
Quick Reply: Appeal partly allowed by the Commission. Case: Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.
Central Information Commission · 2021-01-29 · CIC File No. IK/48546327
Appeal partly allowed by the Commission. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
Information about TIFR Council meetings sought
Case details
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2021-01-29 |
| Citation | CIC File No. IK/48546327 |
| Bench | C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h |
| Petitioner | Naresh Sharma |
| Respondent | Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research |
| RTI Act sections | §2(f), §8(1) |
| Outcome | partly allowed |
Keep RTI Wiki Free for Every Citizen 🇮🇳
Hosting, servers, and content cost ₹50,000+ per month. Your support keeps this resource alive.
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed by the Commission
Ratio decidendi
Information about TIFR Council meetings sought
Keywords
tata, institute, of, fundamental
Similar cases in the corpus
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
- Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021 (CIC 2021)
- Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021 (CIC 2021)
Related
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.
Reader signal
Was this article useful?
Tap once if it helped you. These counters show other citizens which pages are worth reading.