Narendra Singh Bisht v. Punjab National Bank — CIC 2023

Considered an RTI to Punjab National Bank touching a borrower / employee / branch record. Considered an RTI to Punjab National Bank touching a borrower /. Considered an RTI to Punjab National Bank touching a borrower / employee / branch record. ===== Case details ===== ^ Court | Central Information Commission | ^ Decided | 2023-06-23 | ^ Citation | CIC File No. IK/14111938 | ^ Bench | C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h | ^ Petitioner | Narendra Singh Bisht | ^ Respondent | Punjab National Bank | ^ RTI Act sections | §8(1)(e) | ^ Outcome | partly allowed | ===== Outcome ===== Considered an RTI to Punjab National Bank touching a borrower / employee / branch record. ===== Ratio decidendi ===== PSU bank is §2(h); borrower file remains fiduciary under §8(1)(e) except on §8(2) public interest; employee own-record accessible. ===== Keywords ===== punjab, national, bank ===== Similar cases in the corpus ===== These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law. * Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022 (CIC 2022) * Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2021 (CIC 2021) * Harkirat Singh Ghuman v. Punjab & Haryana High Court — CIC 2022 (CIC 2022) * Shashank Raj (Icici Bank Limited) v. Reserve Bank Of India — CIC 2022 (CIC 2022) * Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021 (CIC 2021) ===== Related ===== * All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus * All RTI cases turning on §2 * All RTI cases turning on §8 * Full case-law search * Case-Law Database — overview * PIO RTI Reply Guide * The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated * External reported text →