Right to Information Wiki
Centre for Equity Studies v. UoI

§41b proactive disclosure mandatory for MGNREGA records. Case: Centre for Equity Studies v. UoI. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.

Centre for Equity Studies v. UoI

Centre for Equity Studies v. UoI (Central Information Commission, 2017-04-12) CIC/SS/A/2017/000456 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 4, 17-MGNREGA. §4(1)(b) proactive disclosure mandatory for MGNREGA records. Under §4(1)(b) read with §17 of the MGNREGA Act, proactive disclosure of beneficiary lists and muster rolls is mandatory.

Holding

§4(1)(b) proactive disclosure mandatory for MGNREGA records.

Ratio

Under §4(1)(b) read with §17 of the MGNREGA Act, proactive disclosure of beneficiary lists and muster rolls is mandatory. Refusal under §8(1)(d) commercial confidence in respect of public-money records is impermissible.

Section(s) applied

  • Section 4
  • Section 17-MGNREGA

Practitioner takeaway

Beneficiary lists + muster rolls must be displayed; refusal under §8(1)(d) rejected.

Citation

  • Citation: CIC/SS/A/2017/000456
  • Court: Central Information Commission
  • Date: 2017-04-12
  • Outcome: allowed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: CIC/SS/A/2017/000456

Why this case matters for citizens

This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.

Citizen action steps if your own RTI is being refused on similar grounds

  1. Day 30 — silence by PIO = deemed refusal under §7(2). File §19(1) First Appeal in 30 days using First Appeal Builder.
  2. Day 60-90 — if FAA also refuses, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
  3. Beyond 18 months pending — writ petition under Article 226 to the High Court.
  4. Parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.

Citing this ruling in your appeal

Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.