📱Test our Android app — free beta!Join Beta GroupYou'll receive the install link by email after joining.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—cases:arvind-kejriwal-cpio-cic-2008 [2026/06/03 17:01] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Arvind Kejriwal, §11, third-party consultation, procedure)
 +metatag-description=(§11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground. Case: Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)
 +metatag-title=(Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO — 2008 — RTI case law)}}
 +====== Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 ======
 +**Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO** (Central Information Commission, 2008-04-20) //CIC/AT/A/2008/000123// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 11. §11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground. Section 11 of the RTI Act is a procedural provision requiring consultation with third party.
 +
 +===== Holding =====
 +
 +§11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground.
 +
 +===== Ratio =====
 +
 +Section 11 of the RTI Act is a procedural provision requiring consultation with third party. It is not a substantive exemption. PIO cannot refuse the request outright citing §11 — must follow the consultation procedure and decide on merits.
 +
 +===== Section(s) applied =====
 +
 +  * Section 11
 +
 +===== Practitioner takeaway =====
 +
 +§11 mandates consultation; outright refusal under §11 invalid.
 +
 +===== Citation =====
 +
 +  * **Citation:** CIC/AT/A/2008/000123
 +  * **Court:** Central Information Commission
 +  * **Date:** 2008-04-20
 +  * **Outcome:** allowed
 +  * **Reporter / Cause-list:** CIC/AT/A/2008/000123
 +
 +
 +===== Why this case matters for citizens =====
 +
 +This ruling is part of the **300+ case-law corpus** at [[:cases|RTI Wiki Case-law Database]]. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.
 +
 +===== Citizen action steps if your own RTI is being refused on similar grounds =====
 +
 +  - **Day 30** — silence by PIO = deemed refusal under §7(2). File §19(1) First Appeal in 30 days using [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html|First Appeal Builder]].
 +  - **Day 60-90** — if FAA also refuses, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
 +  - **Beyond 18 months pending** — writ petition under Article 226 to the High Court.
 +  - **Parallel CPGRAMS complaint** at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
 +
 +===== Citing this ruling in your appeal =====
 +
 +Use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/citation-formatter-app.html|Citation Formatter]] to format the citation correctly. Pair with **Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007)** (procedural objections) and **Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014)** (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.
 +
 +===== Related landmark RTI rulings =====
 +
 +  * [[:important-decisions:court:cpio-supreme-court-v-subhash-agarwal|CPIO Supreme Court v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (Constitution Bench)]] — office of CJI is public authority
 +  * [[:important-decisions:court:anjali-bhardwaj-vs-union-of-india|Anjali Bhardwaj v. UoI]] — IC vacancies + transparency
 +  * [[:important-decisions:court:girish-ramchandra-deshpande|Girish Deshpande]] — §8(1)(j) personal information test
 +  * [[:important-decisions:court:bhagat-singh-vs-cic|Bhagat Singh v. CIC]] — procedural compliance
 +  * [[:important-decisions:court:irrelevant-information|Adesh Kumar v. UoI]] — irrelevance is not a ground
 +  * [[:cases|Full case-law database (300+)]]
 +
 +===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
 +
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html|AI RTI Drafter]]
 +  * [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html|First Appeal Builder]]
 +  * [[:important-decisions|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
 +  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005]]
 +
 +===== Original case metadata — Related =====
 +
 +  * [[:cases:search|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
 +  * [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
 +  * [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
 +  * [[:pio-high-court-rulings|High Court RTI rulings]]
 +  * [[:landmark-cic-decisions|Landmark CIC decisions]]
 +  * [[:act|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
 +
 +//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases cic 2008}}