Right to Information Wiki

The working reference for India's Right to Information Act, 2005.

User Tools

Site Tools


cases:arvind-kejriwal-cpio-cic-2008
Translate:

Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO

Arvind Kejriwal v. CPIO (Central Information Commission, 2008-04-20) CIC/AT/A/2008/000123 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 11. §11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground. Section 11 of the RTI Act is a procedural provision requiring consultation with third party.

Holding

§11 third-party process is procedural; cannot be a substantive refusal ground.

Ratio

Section 11 of the RTI Act is a procedural provision requiring consultation with third party. It is not a substantive exemption. PIO cannot refuse the request outright citing §11 — must follow the consultation procedure and decide on merits.

Section(s) applied

  • Section 11

Practitioner takeaway

§11 mandates consultation; outright refusal under §11 invalid.

Citation

  • Citation: CIC/AT/A/2008/000123
  • Court: Central Information Commission
  • Date: 2008-04-20
  • Outcome: allowed
  • Reporter / Cause-list: CIC/AT/A/2008/000123

Discussion

Enter your comment:
 
Share this article
Was this helpful? views
cases/arvind-kejriwal-cpio-cic-2008.txt · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: GNU Free Documentation License 1.3
GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki