Last reviewed: 3 September 2026.
Quick answer: No. Nothing is being deducted from your UPI payments. Parliament changed Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 so that the Central Government can decide by notification which payment modes stay charge free. No such notification has been issued, no rate exists, and no start date exists. Until one is published, nothing changes for you.
In August 2026 a wave of forwarded messages told people that UPI was about to start eating a slice of every payment they made. The law that triggered the panic did something much narrower and much duller. It moved a decision from one place in the statute book to another. It did not create a charge, name a rate, or set a date, and none of those three things exists today.
Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 stops a bank or system provider from imposing any charge on a person making or receiving a payment through the protected electronic modes. That is the rule that has kept UPI and RuPay debit card payments free of a Merchant Discount Rate. The 2026 amendment does not remove that protection. It changes how the protected list is decided, from a fixed cross reference in tax law to a notification issued by the Central Government.
| What the forwarded messages claimed | What is actually the position |
|---|---|
| UPI payments now attract a charge | No charge has been introduced. Section 10A continues to bar a charge on the person making or receiving a protected payment |
| A percentage will be cut from every payment you send | Nothing in the amendment sets any rate. The Ministry of Finance has stated that consumers making payments will not face any transaction charges |
| Money sent to family and friends will be charged | The Ministry of Finance has stated that all person to person transactions will continue to be free of charge |
| The charge starts from a fixed date | No rate and no start date have been notified. The Ministry says the UPI and Services Steering Committee headed by NPCI will decide on the Merchant Discount Rate, if any |
| Parliament has written the charge into the Act | Parliament replaced a fixed cross reference with a power to notify. The amended provision names no mode, no rate and no date |
The single most useful sentence in this whole story is the government's own: as and when a Merchant Discount Rate is introduced, it would apply only to a limited set of merchant transactions, above a threshold, at a nominal rate. That is a description of a decision nobody has taken yet, not a description of something that has happened.
Section 10A is headed Bank, etc., not to impose charge for using electronic modes of payment. India Code records that it was inserted by Act 23 of 2019, section 204, with effect from 1 November 2019.
Its operative words are worth reading slowly, because most coverage skipped them. It says that notwithstanding anything contained in the Act, no bank or system provider shall impose, whether directly or indirectly, any charge upon a person making or receiving a payment by using the electronic modes of payment prescribed under section 269SU of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Three details in that sentence do all the work.
The protected list itself was never written into the Payment and Settlement Systems Act. It sat inside a cross reference to a provision of income tax law. That is the piece the 2026 amendment moved.
The change came through the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. It is one Bill, not a separate payments statute. PRS Legislative Research records that it amends the Income-tax Act, 2025, and also amends the Finance Act, 2026 and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. It was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 4 August 2026, passed by the Lok Sabha on 6 August 2026, and passed by the Rajya Sabha on 10 August 2026.
What it does to Section 10A is a swap. Until now, the protected list of payment modes was fixed by a cross reference: Section 10A pointed at whatever modes were prescribed under section 269SU of the Income-tax Act, and the only way to change the list was to change that tax rule. The amendment removes the fixed cross reference and lets the Central Government specify the protected modes by notification instead.
That is an enabling provision. An enabling provision hands a power to somebody. It does not exercise the power. Before the amendment, the protected list was locked to a tax law rule. After it, the Central Government can publish a notification naming the protected modes. Until that notification is published, there is nothing new to read, and no charge has been switched on by the amendment itself.
The Ministry of Finance said so directly in a press release headed No Charges for UPI Users, issued on 8 August 2026. It stated that consumers making payments will not face any transaction charges, that all person to person transactions will continue to be free of charge, and that the amendment is an enabling provision designed to keep UPI sustainable rather than to charge users. The same release records the scale of what is at stake: UPI processed 2,366 crore transactions worth Rs 29.9 lakh crore in July 2026 alone.
This is the distinction that most of the panic missed, and it matters more than the legal detail.
A Merchant Discount Rate is a merchant side cost. It is a fee that a merchant's bank or payment provider keeps out of the money it settles to the merchant. If you pay Rs 500 at a shop, you pay Rs 500. The merchant is the one who receives slightly less than Rs 500. Nothing extra is pulled out of the payer's account. That is why the Finance Minister's position has been that a Merchant Discount Rate applies to merchants and not to end users.
The government has also said that if a Merchant Discount Rate is ever introduced, it would cover only a limited set of merchant transactions above a threshold, at a nominal rate lower than card rates, and that the vast majority of transactions would stay free even for merchants. No threshold and no rate have been published, so treat any figure you see circulating as unverified.
Two honest caveats belong here. First, Section 10A binds banks and system providers. It says nothing about how a shopkeeper prices goods, so a merchant facing a new cost has ordinary commercial ways of responding to it, and those responses are not a charge imposed by a bank. Second, the decision has not been taken. The Ministry of Finance has said the UPI and Services Steering Committee headed by NPCI will decide on the Merchant Discount Rate, if any. The words “if any” are the government's own.
An illustrative situation, not a named person. A tea stall owner in a district town receives a forward saying that from next month a slice of every UPI payment will be deducted. He starts telling customers to pay cash. Checked against the actual position, the forward has nothing behind it. No notification specifying protected modes under the amended Section 10A has been published, no Merchant Discount Rate has been fixed for UPI, and the Ministry of Finance has said person to person payments stay free of charge. Even in the future scenario the government describes, the cost would sit on the merchant side of the transaction, and would apply only above a threshold that has not been announced. Switching to cash today protects him from nothing and costs him customers.
This article can tell you the position as of 3 September 2026. It cannot promise the position a year from now. So here is how to check for yourself, in the order that works.
To The Central Public Information Officer Department of Financial Services Ministry of Finance Government of India [Office address as published on the Department RTI page] Subject: Information under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 regarding Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Sir/Madam, Please provide the following information: 1. Whether the amendment to Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 carried out through the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 has been brought into force. If yes, please supply a copy of the commencement notification with its number and date. 2. A copy of any notification issued by the Central Government specifying the electronic modes of payment for the purposes of Section 10A of the said Act as amended, along with its number and date of publication in the Gazette of India. If no such notification has been issued as on the date of this application, please state that clearly. 3. Whether any Merchant Discount Rate has been notified, approved or fixed for Unified Payments Interface transactions or for RuPay debit card transactions as on the date of this application. If yes, please supply the document. 4. Copies of the agenda, minutes or recorded decisions of the UPI and Services Steering Committee relating to the Merchant Discount Rate, from 1 August 2026 to the date of this application. 5. Copies of correspondence between this Department and the Reserve Bank of India or the National Payments Corporation of India on the subject of a Merchant Discount Rate on UPI, from 1 August 2026 to the date of this application. 6. The name and designation of the Central Public Information Officer who holds the information sought at points 1 to 5 above. If any part of this request is held by another public authority, please transfer that part under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005 within five days. I enclose the prescribed application fee. Please supply the information within 30 days as required by Section 7(1). Yours faithfully, [Name] [Full postal address] [Phone / email] [Place, Date]
You can file this online through RTI Online, or on paper to the officer named on the Department of Financial Services RTI page, which publishes the current list of Central Public Information Officers. The AI RTI Drafter will format the application for you, how to file an RTI in India covers the basics, and the RTI Fee Calculator tells you what to pay. If nothing arrives in 30 days, that is a deemed refusal and you can use the First Appeal Builder.
If an amount you did not expect leaves your account on a UPI payment, that is far more likely to be an ordinary billing or fraud issue than a policy change. Keep the evidence before you complain.
No. No Merchant Discount Rate has been notified for UPI, and the Ministry of Finance has stated that consumers making payments will not face any transaction charges. Nothing in the 2026 amendment deducts anything from a payer.
Both Houses passed the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, which amends Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. In effect, the protected list of payment modes stops being fixed by a cross reference to section 269SU of the Income-tax Act and becomes something the Central Government can specify by notification. Passage by both Houses and commencement are two different events, and no notification specifying the protected modes has been published. Point 1 of the RTI letter above asks the Department of Financial Services to confirm both in writing.
No. It is one Bill. PRS Legislative Research records that the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 amends the Income-tax Act, 2025, and also amends the Finance Act, 2026 and the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. Reports describing a standalone payments Act are wrong.
It is a fee kept by the merchant's bank or payment provider out of the money settled to the merchant on a digital payment. It sits on the merchant side. The Finance Minister's position has been that a Merchant Discount Rate applies to merchants and not to end users.
No. The Ministry of Finance has stated that all person to person transactions will continue to be free of charge.
No decision has been announced. The Ministry of Finance said that the UPI and Services Steering Committee headed by NPCI will decide on the Merchant Discount Rate, if any. The phrase “if any” is the government's own.
India Code records that Section 10A was inserted by Act 23 of 2019, section 204, with effect from 1 November 2019.
It will appear as a numbered notification in the Gazette of India, backed by a Ministry of Finance announcement and usually an RBI circular to banks. If you cannot find those three things, nothing has changed. The RTI letter above asks the question directly.