Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(ai rti drafter, rti template comparison, ai vs template, rti app, rti generator)
+metatag-description=(AI generates a tailored RTI in 60 seconds; templates require manual fill. When each is right + which is cheaper / faster / more accurate.)}}
+====== AI RTI Drafter vs traditional template — when each wins ======
+{{page>snippets:dpdp-banner}}
+<WRAP info>**TL;DR.** **AI Drafter** is faster (60 sec) and produces context-tailored 5-question RTIs. **Templates** are still useful when you need a known-good shape for a niche scenario the AI hasn't seen. Most users default to AI now.</WRAP>
+===== Compared =====
+| Aspect | AI RTI Drafter | Static template |
+| Time to draft | 60 sec | 10-20 min |
+| Personalisation | ✅ Tailored to your problem | ❌ Generic |
+| 5 specific questions | ✅ AI generates | ❌ You write |
+| Section citation | ✅ Auto | ⚠️ You confirm |
+| Cost | Rs 0 | Rs 0 |
+| Audit trail | ✅ Saved in My Learnings | ❌ Local file |
+| Verified shape | ⚠️ Spot-check | ✅ Known-good |
+===== When AI wins =====
+Your problem is **specific** (e.g., "my pension stopped 3 months ago, I worked at CPWD as a Junior Engineer for 35 years"). The AI infers the right questions, the right office, the right §6 framing.
+===== When template wins =====
+You're filing for a **rare niche** (e.g., RTI to a deemed university about a specific UGC inspection). You want the absolute known-good shape, no surprises.
+===== The hybrid =====
+Use AI to **draft**, then check against the canonical template on the matching `/rti-for-X` page. Best of both worlds.
+===== Related =====
+  * [[:tools:ai-rti-draft-app|AI RTI Drafter]]
+  * [[:file-rti-help|RTI templates]]
+//Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.//
+{{tag>vs/ai rti drafter vs template comparison rti-tools}}

Was this helpful? — views