no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — | swadesh-darshan-2-0-sustainable [2026/05/05 03:31] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{htmlmetatags> | ||
| + | metatag-description=(Swadesh Darshan 2.0 — Ministry of Tourism' | ||
| + | ====== Swadesh Darshan 2.0 — sustainable destinations citizen guide ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Quick answer.** **Swadesh Darshan 2.0 (SD 2.0)** is the **Ministry of Tourism' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Three operational mandates that make SD 2.0 different ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - **Carrying-Capacity Assessment** — a standardised template shared with States to estimate the maximum sustainable visitor load at the destination. Sites that exceed capacity (especially fragile ecological destinations) attract visitor-flow controls + dispersal infrastructure as part of the sanctioned scope. | ||
| + | - **Visitor-Management Strategy** — vehicle regulation, EV-based last-mile mobility, digital booking + time-slot systems, seasonal dispersal, signage + information centres. Aimed at preventing over-tourism degradation. | ||
| + | - **Operation & Maintenance plan** — explicit, named, in the sanction conditions. The State commits to a post-completion O&M arrangement (often through State Tourism Development Corporation + local body) for a defined period, beyond which sustainability is the State' | ||
| + | |||
| + | These three mandates are the lessons learned from SD 1.0 (where post-completion gaps were the most-cited shortcoming). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== The State Perspective Plan (SPP) and Top-10 model ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every State / UT submits an **SPP** that lists **Top-10 destinations** it proposes to develop under SD 2.0. The selection is by the State, reflecting state-level tourism priorities. The Ministry of Tourism, in concurrence with the State, then identifies which destinations from this list will receive central support based on: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Tourism potential** (footfall growth, infrastructure gaps, market readiness) | ||
| + | * **State Government readiness** (land availability, | ||
| + | * **Fund availability** in the Ministry' | ||
| + | * **Equitable distribution** across States / UTs and across categories (heritage, eco, beach, spiritual, etc.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Destinations not selected in a given cycle remain on the State' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Two sub-schemes under SD 2.0 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Challenge-Based Destination Development (CBDD) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A **competitive shortlisting** mechanism for **end-to-end destination experiences**. States submit themed proposals; the Ministry shortlists. CBDD focuses on Culture & Heritage, Spiritual Tourism, Ecotourism / Amrit Dharohar Sites, and similar narrative themes. Detail: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Development of Homestays in Tribal Areas (PM-JUGA) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under the **Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Unnat Gram Abhiyan**, this sub-scheme develops **homestay clusters in tribal villages** to combine livelihood with responsible tourism. Detail: [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Citizen RTI angles ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For an SD 2.0 destination in your district / state: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **PIO, Ministry of Tourism** — sanction order, DPR, CSMC observations, | ||
| + | * **PIO, State Tourism Department** — Carrying-Capacity Assessment + Visitor-Management Strategy as approved | ||
| + | * **PIO, State Tourism Development Corporation** — tender, contractor, completion certificates | ||
| + | * **PIO, Local body** — O&M arrangement post-completion + complaint register | ||
| + | |||
| + | If your state' | ||
| + | |||
| + | → See [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Frequently asked questions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== When was SD 2.0 launched? ==== | ||
| + | **2022**, by the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What's the difference between SD 1.0 and SD 2.0? ==== | ||
| + | SD 1.0 funded // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Who decides which destinations make the SPP? ==== | ||
| + | **State Governments** prepare the SPP based on state-level tourism priorities. The Ministry of Tourism evaluates jointly with the State. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Can a private homestay owner apply directly under SD 2.0? ==== | ||
| + | **Generally no.** SD 2.0 funds States. Individual operators access the scheme indirectly (via the destination' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What's the role of carrying-capacity assessment? ==== | ||
| + | To prevent over-tourism. Especially relevant in fragile destinations (Western Ghats, Himalayan eco-zones, coastal cluster sites). The standardised template estimates maximum sustainable visitor load. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Is the Detailed Project Report (DPR) public? ==== | ||
| + | **Yes** under §6(1) RTI Act read with §4(1)(b)(xii). DPRs are public-authority records of subsidy programmes; routine refusal under §8(1)(d) commercial-confidence has been overturned by CIC and HC orders consistently. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== What if my state hasn't submitted an SPP yet? ==== | ||
| + | File an RTI to State Tourism Department asking the **status of SPP preparation** + **expected submission timeline**. Engage your MP / MLA in parallel. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== When will fresh proposals be invited? ==== | ||
| + | The Ministry of Tourism has formulated an **EFC note for scheme continuation FY 2026-27 to FY 2031-32**. Once approved, the Ministry will issue revised guidelines and States may submit fresh proposals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Related on RTI Wiki ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | * [[: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Sources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Ministry of Tourism — Swadesh Darshan 2.0 Operational Guidelines (2022) | ||
| + | * Press Information Bureau (PIB) releases on SD 2.0 sanctions | ||
| + | * The Right to Information Act, 2005 — §§4(1)(b)(xii), | ||
| + | * //RBI v. Jayantilal N. Mistry//, (2016) 5 SCC 136 | ||
| + | |||
| + | {REVIEWED} | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Last reviewed: 4 May 2026 — RTI Wiki editorial team. Citizen-information piece based on publicly published scheme guidelines.// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||