Search
You can find the results of your search below.
Fulltext results:
- Shri Ketan Kantilal Modi vs Central Board Of Excise & Customs
- 008, which was replied to by the CPIO through his communication dated 24.07.2008. The first-appeal of the appellant dated 07.08.2008 was decided by ... dated 03.09.2008. 2. Appellant filed his second-appeal dated 10.09.2008, which was taken up by the Single Bench of Information Commissioner, Shri A.N Tiwari. A hearing was held on... in this regard." 23. Appellant came up in second-appeal dated 10.09.2008 before the Single Member Bench of the Commission, chaired by Information Commissioner, Shr... tted a written-statement to supplement his second-appeal petition originally filed before the Single-Member Bench of the Commission. These additional submissions note that S
- Ministers Under RTI — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026
- d for compliance. With reference to this second appeal specifically, the Commission declares that the **office of the Ministe... (1)(b) including facility of meeting people. The Commission strongly recommends to implement the reco... e citizen, which was passed by the Parliament and considered as fundamental right intrinsic in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, and be answerable/accountable to the c
- Format for giving information to the applicants
- culars of any Section 6(3) transfer, the name and contact particulars of the First Appellate Authority with the thirty-day appeal period, and a certified-copy endorsement in the p... cation is transferred should be given. - In the concluding para of the reply, it should be clearly mentioned that the First Appeal, if any, against the reply of the CPIO may be mad... erever the applicant has requested for 'certified copies' of the documents or records, the CPIO should endorse on the document "**True copy of the document/record supplied under RTI Act**