Search
You can find the results of your search below.
Fulltext results:
- Supreme Court- Thalappalam Coop. Vs State of Kerala
- hnan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. We are, in these appeals, concerned with the question whether a co-operative society registered under the Kerala Co-... expressed by a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in Writ Appeal No.1688 of 2009, with an earlier judgment of the ... **Facts:** 6. We may, for the disposal of these appeals, refer to the facts pertaining to Mulloor Rural Co-operative Society Ltd. In that case, one Sunil Ku... able to the jurisdiction of the State Information Commission. The Society then preferred Writ Appeal No.1688 of 2009. While that appeal was pending, f
- CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay: Answer Sheets Ruling
- information sought. (iv) The Central Information Commission, by its order dated 23.4.2007 in appeal no. ICPB/A-3/CIC/2006 dated 10.2.2006 had ruled o... is examination in Pondicherry, Goa, Andaman and Nicobar islands, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu or Karnataka itself but he has no way of knowing exactly which... t of his principal." 20.5) In Wolf vs. Superior Court [2003 (107) California Appeals, 4th 25] the California Court of Appeals defined fiduciary relationship as under : "any ... the scope of the RTI Act and the safeguards and conditions subject to which 'information' should be furnished. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. ……………………….J [R. V
- Shri Ketan Kantilal Modi vs Central Board Of Excise & Customs @important-decisions:cic-case-laws
- 2.09.2009 ===== FACTS OF THE CASE: ===== This second-appeal originated in appellant's RTI-application dated 3... 008, which was replied to by the CPIO through his communication dated 24.07.2008. The first-appeal of the appellant dated 07.08.2008 was decided by ... order dated 03.09.2008. 2. Appellant filed his second-appeal dated 10.09.2008, which was taken up by the Singl... tten-statement, which has been made part of the second-appeal record. 8. During the hearing, the Bench reminde
- Court Decisions on RTI — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026
- | | 20. | Karnataka Information Commission Vs SPIO & Anr on 18-Jan-2013 ... | {{:important-decisions:sc_2013_kic_vs_karnataka_high_court_-_inf_to_be_obtained_under_court_rules.pdf|Download}} | | 21. | Public Concer... 2-2014 (HC of Delhi)}} - {{:important-decisions:commsnrcest-vs-cicandanr.pdf|The Commissioner (Appeal) of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ranchi Vs Cen... 11-2009 (HC of Delhi) - {{:important-decisions:mkaliaperumal-vs-cicandors.pdf|M.Kaliaperumal Vs Central Information Commission and Ors.}} dated 18-11-2009 (HC of Madras
- Case law library — landmark decisions on the Right to Information Act, 2005
- x for each, and two case studies of rejected RTIs corrected on appeal. </WRAP> //A curated library of the most importa... round of refusal. ===== Sections 18, 19 and 20 — complaint, appeal, penalty ===== * **Chief Information Commissio... r v. State of Manipur**, (2011) 15 SCC 1. Supreme Court. Section 18 complaint and Section 19 appeal are distinct jurisdictions. Section 18 does not give the Commission an appellate power to direct disclosure;
- Commission Decisions — the CIC line of case law
- lal-modi-vs-central-board-of-excise-customs|Ketan Kantilal Modi v. Central Board of Excise & Customs]]**. Scope of Section 6(1) "concerned public authority" an... entity, clause-wise reasoning on any withholding, appeal route, and the certified-copy endorsement. * **[[:important-decisions:cic-c... earance of an Advocate or non-Advocate before the Commission]]**. Punjab State Information Commission, Full Bench. Any person, including a non-Advocate, m
- Ministers Under RTI — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 @important-decisions:cic-case-laws
- ituted for compliance. With reference to this second appeal specifically, the Commission declares that the **office of the Minister for Law as public authority u... (1)(b) including facility of meeting people. The Commission strongly recommends to implement the recommendations of NCRWC, Second ARC and **replace the ‘
- Format for giving information to the applicants @important-decisions:cic-case-laws
- culars of any Section 6(3) transfer, the name and contact particulars of the First Appellate Authority with the thirty-day appeal period, and a certified-copy endorsement in the p... cation is transferred should be given. - In the concluding para of the reply, it should be clearly mentioned that the First Appeal, if any, against the reply of the CPIO may be mad... erever the applicant has requested for 'certified copies' of the documents or records, the CPIO should endorse on the document "**True copy of the documen